Since our substitute snprintf now returns a C99-compliant result,
there's no need anymore to have complicated code to cope with pre-C99
behavior. We can just make configure substitute snprintf.c if it finds
that the system snprintf() is pre-C99. (Note: I do not believe that
there are any platforms where this test will trigger that weren't
already being rejected due to our other C99-ish feature requirements for
snprintf. But let's add the check for paranoia's sake.) Then, simplify
the call sites that had logic to cope with the pre-C99 definition.
I also dropped some stuff that was being paranoid about the possibility
of snprintf overrunning the given buffer. The only reports we've ever
heard of that being a problem were for Solaris 7, which is long dead,
and we've sure not heard any reports of these assertions triggering in
a long time. So let's drop that complexity too.
Likewise, drop some code that wasn't trusting snprintf to set errno
when it returns -1. That would be not-per-spec, and again there's
no real reason to believe it is a live issue, especially not for
snprintfs that pass all of configure's feature checks.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17245.
1534289329@sss.pgh.pa.us
AC_MSG_RESULT([$pgac_cv_snprintf_size_t_support])
])# PGAC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_SIZE_T_SUPPORT
+# PGAC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_C99_RESULT
+# -----------------------------
+# Determine whether snprintf returns the desired buffer length when
+# it overruns the actual buffer length. That's required by C99 and POSIX
+# but ancient platforms don't behave that way, so we must test.
+#
+AC_DEFUN([PGAC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_C99_RESULT],
+[AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether snprintf reports buffer overrun per C99])
+AC_CACHE_VAL(pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result,
+[AC_RUN_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string.h>
+
+int main()
+{
+ char buf[10];
+
+ if (snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "12345678901234567890") != 20)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}]])],
+[pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=yes],
+[pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=no],
+[pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=cross])
+])dnl AC_CACHE_VAL
+AC_MSG_RESULT([$pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result])
+])# PGAC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_C99_RESULT
+
# PGAC_TYPE_LOCALE_T
# ------------------
# Run tests below here
# --------------------
-# Force use of our snprintf if system's doesn't do arg control
+# For NLS, force use of our snprintf if system's doesn't do arg control.
# See comment above at snprintf test for details.
if test "$enable_nls" = yes -a "$pgac_need_repl_snprintf" = no; then
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether snprintf supports argument control" >&5
fi
fi
+# Force use of our snprintf if the system's doesn't handle buffer overrun
+# as specified by C99.
+if test "$pgac_need_repl_snprintf" = no; then
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether snprintf reports buffer overrun per C99" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether snprintf reports buffer overrun per C99... " >&6; }
+if ${pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result+:} false; then :
+ $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
+else
+ if test "$cross_compiling" = yes; then :
+ pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=cross
+else
+ cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
+/* end confdefs.h. */
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string.h>
+
+int main()
+{
+ char buf[10];
+
+ if (snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "12345678901234567890") != 20)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+_ACEOF
+if ac_fn_c_try_run "$LINENO"; then :
+ pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=yes
+else
+ pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result=no
+fi
+rm -f core *.core core.conftest.* gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext \
+ conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
+fi
+
+
+fi
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result" >&5
+$as_echo "$pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result" >&6; }
+
+ if test "$pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result" != yes; then
+ pgac_need_repl_snprintf=yes
+ fi
+fi
+
# Now we have checked all the reasons to replace snprintf
if test $pgac_need_repl_snprintf = yes; then
# Run tests below here
# --------------------
-# Force use of our snprintf if system's doesn't do arg control
+# For NLS, force use of our snprintf if system's doesn't do arg control.
# See comment above at snprintf test for details.
if test "$enable_nls" = yes -a "$pgac_need_repl_snprintf" = no; then
PGAC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_ARG_CONTROL
fi
fi
+# Force use of our snprintf if the system's doesn't handle buffer overrun
+# as specified by C99.
+if test "$pgac_need_repl_snprintf" = no; then
+ PGAC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_C99_RESULT
+ if test "$pgac_cv_snprintf_c99_result" != yes; then
+ pgac_need_repl_snprintf=yes
+ fi
+fi
+
# Now we have checked all the reasons to replace snprintf
if test $pgac_need_repl_snprintf = yes; then
AC_DEFINE(USE_REPL_SNPRINTF, 1, [Use replacement snprintf() functions.])
if (*maxbytes <= 0)
elog(ERROR, "not enough space to serialize GUC state");
- errno = 0;
-
va_start(vargs, fmt);
n = vsnprintf(*destptr, *maxbytes, fmt, vargs);
va_end(vargs);
- /*
- * Cater to portability hazards in the vsnprintf() return value just like
- * appendPQExpBufferVA() does. Note that this requires an extra byte of
- * slack at the end of the buffer. Since serialize_variable() ends with a
- * do_serialize_binary() rather than a do_serialize(), we'll always have
- * that slack; estimate_variable_size() need not add a byte for it.
- */
- if (n < 0 || n >= *maxbytes - 1)
+ if (n < 0)
{
- if (n < 0 && errno != 0 && errno != ENOMEM)
- /* Shouldn't happen. Better show errno description. */
- elog(ERROR, "vsnprintf failed: %m");
- else
- elog(ERROR, "not enough space to serialize GUC state");
+ /* Shouldn't happen. Better show errno description. */
+ elog(ERROR, "vsnprintf failed: %m");
+ }
+ if (n >= *maxbytes)
+ {
+ /* This shouldn't happen either, really. */
+ elog(ERROR, "not enough space to serialize GUC state");
}
/* Shift the destptr ahead of the null terminator */
* pvsnprintf
*
* Attempt to format text data under the control of fmt (an sprintf-style
- * format string) and insert it into buf (which has length len, len > 0).
+ * format string) and insert it into buf (which has length len).
*
* If successful, return the number of bytes emitted, not counting the
* trailing zero byte. This will always be strictly less than len.
* Other error cases do not return, but exit via elog(ERROR) or exit().
* Hence, this shouldn't be used inside libpq.
*
- * This function exists mainly to centralize our workarounds for
- * non-C99-compliant vsnprintf implementations. Generally, any call that
- * pays any attention to the return value should go through here rather
- * than calling snprintf or vsnprintf directly.
- *
* Note that the semantics of the return value are not exactly C99's.
* First, we don't promise that the estimated buffer size is exactly right;
* callers must be prepared to loop multiple times to get the right size.
+ * (Given a C99-compliant vsnprintf, that won't happen, but it is rumored
+ * that some implementations don't always return the same value ...)
* Second, we return the recommended buffer size, not one less than that;
* this lets overflow concerns be handled here rather than in the callers.
*/
{
int nprinted;
- Assert(len > 0);
-
- errno = 0;
-
- /*
- * Assert check here is to catch buggy vsnprintf that overruns the
- * specified buffer length. Solaris 7 in 64-bit mode is an example of a
- * platform with such a bug.
- */
-#ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING
- buf[len - 1] = '\0';
-#endif
-
nprinted = vsnprintf(buf, len, fmt, args);
- Assert(buf[len - 1] == '\0');
-
- /*
- * If vsnprintf reports an error other than ENOMEM, fail. The possible
- * causes of this are not user-facing errors, so elog should be enough.
- */
- if (nprinted < 0 && errno != 0 && errno != ENOMEM)
+ /* We assume failure means the fmt is bogus, hence hard failure is OK */
+ if (unlikely(nprinted < 0))
{
#ifndef FRONTEND
elog(ERROR, "vsnprintf failed: %m");
#endif
}
- /*
- * Note: some versions of vsnprintf return the number of chars actually
- * stored, not the total space needed as C99 specifies. And at least one
- * returns -1 on failure. Be conservative about believing whether the
- * print worked.
- */
- if (nprinted >= 0 && (size_t) nprinted < len - 1)
+ if ((size_t) nprinted < len)
{
/* Success. Note nprinted does not include trailing null. */
return (size_t) nprinted;
}
- if (nprinted >= 0 && (size_t) nprinted > len)
- {
- /*
- * This appears to be a C99-compliant vsnprintf, so believe its
- * estimate of the required space. (If it's wrong, the logic will
- * still work, but we may loop multiple times.) Note that the space
- * needed should be only nprinted+1 bytes, but we'd better allocate
- * one more than that so that the test above will succeed next time.
- *
- * In the corner case where the required space just barely overflows,
- * fall through so that we'll error out below (possibly after
- * looping).
- */
- if ((size_t) nprinted <= MaxAllocSize - 2)
- return nprinted + 2;
- }
-
/*
- * Buffer overrun, and we don't know how much space is needed. Estimate
- * twice the previous buffer size, but not more than MaxAllocSize; if we
- * are already at MaxAllocSize, choke. Note we use this palloc-oriented
- * overflow limit even when in frontend.
+ * We assume a C99-compliant vsnprintf, so believe its estimate of the
+ * required space, and add one for the trailing null. (If it's wrong, the
+ * logic will still work, but we may loop multiple times.)
+ *
+ * Choke if the required space would exceed MaxAllocSize. Note we use
+ * this palloc-oriented overflow limit even when in frontend.
*/
- if (len >= MaxAllocSize)
+ if (unlikely((size_t) nprinted > MaxAllocSize - 1))
{
#ifndef FRONTEND
ereport(ERROR,
#endif
}
- if (len >= MaxAllocSize / 2)
- return MaxAllocSize;
-
- return len * 2;
+ return nprinted + 1;
}
*/
if (str->maxlen > str->len + 16)
{
- /*
- * Note: we intentionally leave one byte unused, as a guard against
- * old broken versions of vsnprintf.
- */
- avail = str->maxlen - str->len - 1;
-
- errno = 0;
+ avail = str->maxlen - str->len;
nprinted = vsnprintf(str->data + str->len, avail, fmt, args);
/*
- * If vsnprintf reports an error other than ENOMEM, fail.
+ * If vsnprintf reports an error, fail (we assume this means there's
+ * something wrong with the format string).
*/
- if (nprinted < 0 && errno != 0 && errno != ENOMEM)
+ if (unlikely(nprinted < 0))
{
markPQExpBufferBroken(str);
return true;
}
- /*
- * Note: some versions of vsnprintf return the number of chars
- * actually stored, not the total space needed as C99 specifies. And
- * at least one returns -1 on failure. Be conservative about
- * believing whether the print worked.
- */
- if (nprinted >= 0 && (size_t) nprinted < avail - 1)
+ if ((size_t) nprinted < avail)
{
/* Success. Note nprinted does not include trailing null. */
str->len += nprinted;
return true;
}
- if (nprinted >= 0 && (size_t) nprinted > avail)
- {
- /*
- * This appears to be a C99-compliant vsnprintf, so believe its
- * estimate of the required space. (If it's wrong, the logic will
- * still work, but we may loop multiple times.) Note that the
- * space needed should be only nprinted+1 bytes, but we'd better
- * allocate one more than that so that the test above will succeed
- * next time.
- *
- * In the corner case where the required space just barely
- * overflows, fail.
- */
- if (nprinted > INT_MAX - 2)
- {
- markPQExpBufferBroken(str);
- return true;
- }
- needed = nprinted + 2;
- }
- else
+ /*
+ * We assume a C99-compliant vsnprintf, so believe its estimate of the
+ * required space, and add one for the trailing null. (If it's wrong,
+ * the logic will still work, but we may loop multiple times.)
+ *
+ * Choke if the required space would exceed INT_MAX, since str->maxlen
+ * can't represent more than that.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(nprinted > INT_MAX - 1))
{
- /*
- * Buffer overrun, and we don't know how much space is needed.
- * Estimate twice the previous buffer size, but not more than
- * INT_MAX.
- */
- if (avail >= INT_MAX / 2)
- needed = INT_MAX;
- else
- needed = avail * 2;
+ markPQExpBufferBroken(str);
+ return true;
}
+ needed = nprinted + 1;
}
else
{
/*
* We have to guess at how much to enlarge, since we're skipping the
- * formatting work.
+ * formatting work. Fortunately, because of enlargePQExpBuffer's
+ * preference for power-of-2 sizes, this number isn't very sensitive;
+ * the net effect is that we'll double the buffer size before trying
+ * to run vsnprintf, which seems sensible.
*/
needed = 32;
}