Back-patch the 9.4-era commit
2636ecf78 into 9.3, as that fixes a case
where we open a relation while not holding any lock on it. It's
probably mostly safe anyway, since no other session could touch the
newly-created table; but I think CheckTableNotInUse could be fooled
if one tried.
Per testing with a patch that complains if we open a relation without
holding any lock on it. I don't plan to back-patch that patch, but we
should close the holes it identifies in all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2038.
1538335244@sss.pgh.pa.us
#include "executor/executor.h"
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "rewrite/rewriteHandler.h"
+#include "storage/lmgr.h"
#include "storage/smgr.h"
#include "tcop/tcopprot.h"
#include "utils/rel.h"
tableSpace = matviewRel->rd_rel->reltablespace;
- /* Create the transient table that will receive the regenerated data. */
+ /*
+ * Create the transient table that will receive the regenerated data. Lock
+ * it against access by any other process until commit (by which time it
+ * will be gone).
+ */
OIDNewHeap = make_new_heap(matviewOid, tableSpace);
+ LockRelationOid(OIDNewHeap, AccessExclusiveLock);
dest = CreateTransientRelDestReceiver(OIDNewHeap);
/* Generate the data, if wanted. */