This commit fixes a crash that happens when clang is analyzing a
transparent_union attribute on a union which has a field with incomplete type.
rdar://
28630028
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25273
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@283432
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
return;
}
+ if (FirstType->isIncompleteType())
+ return;
uint64_t FirstSize = S.Context.getTypeSize(FirstType);
uint64_t FirstAlign = S.Context.getTypeAlign(FirstType);
for (; Field != FieldEnd; ++Field) {
QualType FieldType = Field->getType();
+ if (FieldType->isIncompleteType())
+ return;
// FIXME: this isn't fully correct; we also need to test whether the
// members of the union would all have the same calling convention as the
// first member of the union. Checking just the size and alignment isn't
unsigned int u3;
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
} __attribute__((transparent_union));
+
+union pr30520v { void b; } __attribute__((transparent_union)); // expected-error {{field has incomplete type 'void'}}
+
+union pr30520a { int b[]; } __attribute__((transparent_union)); // expected-error {{field has incomplete type 'int []'}}
+
+// expected-note@+1 2 {{forward declaration of 'struct stb'}}
+union pr30520s { struct stb b; } __attribute__((transparent_union)); // expected-error {{field has incomplete type 'struct stb'}}
+
+union pr30520s2 { int *v; struct stb b; } __attribute__((transparent_union)); // expected-error {{field has incomplete type 'struct stb'}}