Fix inconsistency in comments atop ExecParallelEstimate.

When this code was initially introduced in commit d1b7c1ff, the structure
used was SharedPlanStateInstrumentation, but later when it got changed to
Instrumentation structure in commit b287df70, we forgot to update the
comment.

Reported-by: Wu Fei
Author: Wu Fei
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/52E6E0843B9D774C8C73D6CF64402F0562215EB2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c b/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
index 0ab9a9939c28de04fcf8a67b44cfc29be03e9020..53cd2fc666b0ff432f6a13e860b1a70eaa8e192e 100644 (file)
--- a/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ ExecSerializePlan(Plan *plan, EState *estate)
  * &pcxt->estimator.
  *
  * While we're at it, count the number of PlanState nodes in the tree, so
- * we know how many SharedPlanStateInstrumentation structures we need.
+ * we know how many Instrumentation structures we need.
  */
 static bool
 ExecParallelEstimate(PlanState *planstate, ExecParallelEstimateContext *e)