[analyzer] Fix some check's output plist not containing the check name

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41538

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@321933 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h b/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h
index 18fa85c9657f6df55cf49f07c6c8b16a4364a760..d3163ef3e576d51d3f766e5e35bce708279b73bb 100644 (file)
--- a/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h
+++ b/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h
@@ -32,27 +32,39 @@ private:
   const CheckName Check;
   const std::string Name;
   const std::string Category;
-  bool SuppressonSink;
+  const CheckerBase *Checker;
+  bool SuppressOnSink;
 
   virtual void anchor();
+
 public:
-  BugType(class CheckName check, StringRef name, StringRef cat)
-      : Check(check), Name(name), Category(cat), SuppressonSink(false) {}
-  BugType(const CheckerBase *checker, StringRef name, StringRef cat)
-      : Check(checker->getCheckName()), Name(name), Category(cat),
-        SuppressonSink(false) {}
-  virtual ~BugType() {}
-
-  // FIXME: Should these be made strings as well?
+  BugType(CheckName Check, StringRef Name, StringRef Cat)
+      : Check(Check), Name(Name), Category(Cat), Checker(nullptr),
+        SuppressOnSink(false) {}
+  BugType(const CheckerBase *Checker, StringRef Name, StringRef Cat)
+      : Check(Checker->getCheckName()), Name(Name), Category(Cat),
+        Checker(Checker), SuppressOnSink(false) {}
+  virtual ~BugType() = default;
+
   StringRef getName() const { return Name; }
   StringRef getCategory() const { return Category; }
-  StringRef getCheckName() const { return Check.getName(); }
+  StringRef getCheckName() const {
+    // FIXME: This is a workaround to ensure that the correct check name is used
+    // The check names are set after the constructors are run.
+    // In case the BugType object is initialized in the checker's ctor
+    // the Check field will be empty. To circumvent this problem we use 
+    // CheckerBase whenever it is possible.
+    StringRef CheckName =
+        Checker ? Checker->getCheckName().getName() : Check.getName();
+    assert(!CheckName.empty() && "Check name is not set properly.");
+    return CheckName;
+  }
 
   /// isSuppressOnSink - Returns true if bug reports associated with this bug
   ///  type should be suppressed if the end node of the report is post-dominated
   ///  by a sink node.
-  bool isSuppressOnSink() const { return SuppressonSink; }
-  void setSuppressOnSink(bool x) { SuppressonSink = x; }
+  bool isSuppressOnSink() const { return SuppressOnSink; }
+  void setSuppressOnSink(bool x) { SuppressOnSink = x; }
 
   virtual void FlushReports(BugReporter& BR);
 };
@@ -74,7 +86,7 @@ public:
   StringRef getDescription() const { return desc; }
 };
 
-} // end GR namespace
+} // end ento namespace
 
 } // end clang namespace
 #endif

diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
index 851114004b9636a11f02b7ba7aad3d2fa029fcab..904c9ffa37df4cac791933855492e4b0b1cafa43 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
@@ -2900,8 +2900,13 @@ void ento::registerNewDeleteLeaksChecker(CheckerManager &mgr) {
       mgr.getCurrentCheckName();
   // We currently treat NewDeleteLeaks checker as a subchecker of NewDelete
   // checker.
-  if (!checker->ChecksEnabled[MallocChecker::CK_NewDeleteChecker])
+  if (!checker->ChecksEnabled[MallocChecker::CK_NewDeleteChecker]) {
     checker->ChecksEnabled[MallocChecker::CK_NewDeleteChecker] = true;
+    // FIXME: This does not set the correct name, but without this workaround
+    //        no name will be set at all.
+    checker->CheckNames[MallocChecker::CK_NewDeleteChecker] =
+        mgr.getCurrentCheckName();
+  }
 }
 
 #define REGISTER_CHECKER(name)                                                 \

diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ValistChecker.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ValistChecker.cpp
index 06c4ef71d80bc9bb9fe4ab640faff365628ccc1c..1ebac2118a42b71c83208fa0a1acd351850bddbb 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ValistChecker.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ValistChecker.cpp
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ private:
                                  CheckerContext &C) const;
   void reportLeakedVALists(const RegionVector &LeakedVALists, StringRef Msg1,
                            StringRef Msg2, CheckerContext &C, ExplodedNode *N,
-                           bool ForceReport = false) const;
+                           bool ReportUninit = false) const;
 
   void checkVAListStartCall(const CallEvent &Call, CheckerContext &C,
                             bool IsCopy) const;
@@ -267,15 +267,19 @@ void ValistChecker::reportUninitializedAccess(const MemRegion *VAList,
 void ValistChecker::reportLeakedVALists(const RegionVector &LeakedVALists,
                                         StringRef Msg1, StringRef Msg2,
                                         CheckerContext &C, ExplodedNode *N,
-                                        bool ForceReport) const {
+                                        bool ReportUninit) const {
   if (!(ChecksEnabled[CK_Unterminated] ||
-        (ChecksEnabled[CK_Uninitialized] && ForceReport)))
+        (ChecksEnabled[CK_Uninitialized] && ReportUninit)))
     return;
   for (auto Reg : LeakedVALists) {
     if (!BT_leakedvalist) {
-      BT_leakedvalist.reset(new BugType(CheckNames[CK_Unterminated],
-                                        "Leaked va_list",
-                                        categories::MemoryError));
+      // FIXME: maybe creating a new check name for this type of bug is a better
+      // solution.
+      BT_leakedvalist.reset(
+          new BugType(CheckNames[CK_Unterminated].getName().empty()
+                          ? CheckNames[CK_Uninitialized]
+                          : CheckNames[CK_Unterminated],
+                      "Leaked va_list", categories::MemoryError));
       BT_leakedvalist->setSuppressOnSink(true);
     }
 
@@ -375,7 +379,7 @@ void ValistChecker::checkVAListEndCall(const CallEvent &Call,
 
 std::shared_ptr<PathDiagnosticPiece> ValistChecker::ValistBugVisitor::VisitNode(
     const ExplodedNode *N, const ExplodedNode *PrevN, BugReporterContext &BRC,
-    BugReport &BR) {
+    BugReport &) {
   ProgramStateRef State = N->getState();
   ProgramStateRef StatePrev = PrevN->getState();
 

diff --git a/test/Analysis/malloc.c b/test/Analysis/malloc.c
index 4c364ebd9a2f227846cde717d47f4fb606ffebf0..e08ec1b76cffb11eef373b76d5730f3af1cb282d 100644 (file)
--- a/test/Analysis/malloc.c
+++ b/test/Analysis/malloc.c
@@ -1720,13 +1720,6 @@ void *smallocWarn(size_t size) {
   }
 }
 
-char *dupstrWarn(const char *s) {
-  const int len = strlen(s);
-  char *p = (char*) smallocWarn(len + 1);
-  strcpy(p, s); // expected-warning{{String copy function overflows destination buffer}}
-  return p;
-}
-
 int *radar15580979() {
   int *data = (int *)malloc(32);
   int *p = data ?: (int*)malloc(32); // no warning