unless we already know that it has a definition. Fixes
PR9449/<rdar://problem/
9115785>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@127512
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
MemberOfUnknownSpecialization);
if (TNK == TNK_Non_template && LookupCtx->isDependentContext() &&
isa<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx) &&
- cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasAnyDependentBases()) {
+ (!cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasDefinition() ||
+ cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx)->hasAnyDependentBases())) {
// This is a dependent template. Handle it below.
} else if (TNK == TNK_Non_template) {
Diag(Name.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
Y<X, int> yxi; // expected-note{{in instantiation of template class 'PR9226::Y<PR9226::X, int>' requested here}}
}
+
+namespace PR9449 {
+ template <typename T>
+ struct s; // expected-note{{template is declared here}}
+
+ template <typename T>
+ void f() {
+ int s<T>::template n<T>::* f; // expected-error{{implicit instantiation of undefined template 'PR9449::s<int>'}} \
+ // expected-error{{following the 'template' keyword}}
+ }
+
+ template void f<int>(); // expected-note{{in instantiation of}}
+}