We didn't consider any alignment attributes on an EnumDecl when
calculating alignment.
While we are here, ignore alignment specifications on typedef types if
one is used as the underlying type. Otherwise, weird things happen:
enum Y : int;
Y y;
typedef int __attribute__((aligned(64))) u;
enum Y : u {};
What is the alignment of 'Y'? It would be more consistent with the
overall design of enums with fixed underlying types to consider the
underlying type's UnqualifiedDesugaredType.
This fixes PR22279.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@226653
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
break;
}
- if (const EnumType *ET = dyn_cast<EnumType>(TT))
- return getTypeInfo(ET->getDecl()->getIntegerType());
+ if (const EnumType *ET = dyn_cast<EnumType>(TT)) {
+ const EnumDecl *ED = ET->getDecl();
+ TypeInfo Info =
+ getTypeInfo(ED->getIntegerType()->getUnqualifiedDesugaredType());
+ if (unsigned AttrAlign = ED->getMaxAlignment()) {
+ Info.Align = AttrAlign;
+ Info.AlignIsRequired = true;
+ }
+ return Info;
+ }
const RecordType *RT = cast<RecordType>(TT);
const ASTRecordLayout &Layout = getASTRecordLayout(RT->getDecl());
T = T->getBaseElementTypeUnsafe();
if (const ComplexType *CT = T->getAs<ComplexType>())
T = CT->getElementType().getTypePtr();
+ if (const EnumType *ET = T->getAs<EnumType>())
+ T = ET->getDecl()->getIntegerType().getTypePtr();
if (T->isSpecificBuiltinType(BuiltinType::Double) ||
T->isSpecificBuiltinType(BuiltinType::LongLong) ||
T->isSpecificBuiltinType(BuiltinType::ULongLong))
void Sema::CheckAlignasUnderalignment(Decl *D) {
assert(D->hasAttrs() && "no attributes on decl");
- QualType Ty;
- if (ValueDecl *VD = dyn_cast<ValueDecl>(D))
- Ty = VD->getType();
- else
- Ty = Context.getTagDeclType(cast<TagDecl>(D));
- if (Ty->isDependentType() || Ty->isIncompleteType())
+ QualType UnderlyingTy, DiagTy;
+ if (ValueDecl *VD = dyn_cast<ValueDecl>(D)) {
+ UnderlyingTy = DiagTy = VD->getType();
+ } else {
+ UnderlyingTy = DiagTy = Context.getTagDeclType(cast<TagDecl>(D));
+ if (EnumDecl *ED = dyn_cast<EnumDecl>(D))
+ UnderlyingTy = ED->getIntegerType();
+ }
+ if (DiagTy->isDependentType() || DiagTy->isIncompleteType())
return;
// C++11 [dcl.align]p5, C11 6.7.5/4:
if (AlignasAttr && Align) {
CharUnits RequestedAlign = Context.toCharUnitsFromBits(Align);
- CharUnits NaturalAlign = Context.getTypeAlignInChars(Ty);
+ CharUnits NaturalAlign = Context.getTypeAlignInChars(UnderlyingTy);
if (NaturalAlign > RequestedAlign)
Diag(AlignasAttr->getLocation(), diag::err_alignas_underaligned)
- << Ty << (unsigned)NaturalAlign.getQuantity();
+ << DiagTy << (unsigned)NaturalAlign.getQuantity();
}
}
enum alignas(1) E2 : char {}; // ok
enum alignas(4) E3 { e3 = 0 }; // ok
enum alignas(4) E4 { e4 = 1ull << 33 }; // expected-error {{requested alignment is less than minimum alignment of 8 for type 'E4'}}
+enum alignas(8) E5 {};
+static_assert(alignof(E5) == 8, "");
+
+typedef __attribute__((aligned(16))) int IntAlign16;
+enum E6 : IntAlign16 {};
+static_assert(alignof(E6) == 4, "");
struct S1 {
alignas(8) int n;
short chk1[__alignof__(g6) == 8 ? 1 : -1];
short chk2[__alignof__(double[3]) == 8 ? 1 : -1];
+enum { x = 18446744073709551615ULL } g7;
+short chk1[__alignof__(g7) == 8 ? 1 : -1];
// PR5637