Problem: Using <sfile> in a function gives an unexpected result.
Solution: Give an error in a Vim9 function. (issue #9189)
INIT(= N_("E1243: ASCII code not in 32-127 range"));
EXTERN char e_bad_color_string_str[]
INIT(= N_("E1244: Bad color string: %s"));
+EXTERN char e_cannot_expand_sfile_in_vim9_function[]
+ INIT(= N_("E1245: Cannot expand <sfile> in a Vim9 function"));
return vim_strsave(entry->es_name);
}
#ifdef FEAT_EVAL
+ // expand('<sfile>') works in a function for backwards compatibility, but
+ // may give an unexpected result. Disallow it in Vim 9 script.
+ if (which == ESTACK_SFILE && in_vim9script())
+ {
+ int save_emsg_off = emsg_off;
+
+ if (emsg_off == 1)
+ // f_expand() silences errors but we do want this one
+ emsg_off = 0;
+ emsg(_(e_cannot_expand_sfile_in_vim9_function));
+ emsg_off = save_emsg_off;
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
// Give information about each stack entry up to the root.
// For a function we compose the call stack, as it was done in the past:
// "function One[123]..Two[456]..Three"
CheckDefAndScriptFailure2(['expand("a", 2)'], 'E1013: Argument 2: type mismatch, expected bool but got number', 'E1212: Bool required for argument 2')
CheckDefAndScriptFailure2(['expand("a", true, 2)'], 'E1013: Argument 3: type mismatch, expected bool but got number', 'E1212: Bool required for argument 3')
expand('')->assert_equal('')
+
+ var caught = false
+ try
+ echo expand("<sfile>")
+ catch /E1245:/
+ caught = true
+ endtry
+ assert_true(caught)
enddef
def Test_expandcmd()
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+ 3646,
/**/
3645,
/**/