iff its substitution contains an unexpanded parameter pack. This has the effect
that we now reject declarations such as this (which we used to crash when
expanding):
template<typename T> using Int = int;
template<typename ...Ts> void f(Int<Ts> ...ints);
The standard is inconsistent on how this case should be treated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@148905
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
Canon.isNull()? T.isDependent() : Canon->isDependentType(),
Canon.isNull()? T.isDependent()
: Canon->isInstantiationDependentType(),
- false, T.containsUnexpandedParameterPack()),
+ false,
+ Canon.isNull()? T.containsUnexpandedParameterPack()
+ : Canon->containsUnexpandedParameterPack()),
Template(T), NumArgs(NumArgs) {
assert(!T.getAsDependentTemplateName() &&
"Use DependentTemplateSpecializationType for dependent template-name");
if (Args[Arg].getKind() == TemplateArgument::Type &&
Args[Arg].getAsType()->isVariablyModifiedType())
setVariablyModified();
- if (Args[Arg].containsUnexpandedParameterPack())
+ if (Canon.isNull() && Args[Arg].containsUnexpandedParameterPack())
setContainsUnexpandedParameterPack();
new (&TemplateArgs[Arg]) TemplateArgument(Args[Arg]);
// FIXME: When OldParm is a parameter pack and NewParm is not a parameter
// pack, we actually have a set of instantiated locations. Maintain this set!
if (OldParm->isParameterPack() && !NewParm->isParameterPack()) {
- // Add the new parameter to
+ // Add the new parameter to the instantiated parameter pack.
CurrentInstantiationScope->InstantiatedLocalPackArg(OldParm, NewParm);
} else {
// Introduce an Old -> New mapping
itt::rebind<bool> btr;
itt::rebind_thing<bool> btt(btr);
+
+namespace PR11848 {
+ template<typename T> using U = int;
+
+ template<typename T, typename ...Ts>
+ void f(U<T> i, U<Ts> ...is) { // expected-error {{type 'U<Ts>' (aka 'int') of function parameter pack does not contain any unexpanded parameter packs}}
+ return i + f<Ts...>(is...); // expected-error {{pack expansion does not contain any unexpanded parameter packs}}
+ }
+
+ template<typename ...Ts>
+ struct S {
+ S(U<Ts>...ts); // expected-error {{does not contain any unexpanded parameter packs}}
+ };
+
+ template<typename T>
+ struct Hidden1 {
+ template<typename ...Ts>
+ Hidden1(typename T::template U<Ts> ...ts);
+ };
+
+ template<typename T, typename ...Ts>
+ struct Hidden2 {
+ Hidden2(typename T::template U<Ts> ...ts);
+ };
+
+ struct Hide {
+ template<typename T> using U = int;
+ };
+
+ // FIXME: This case crashes clang at the moment.
+ //Hidden1<Hide> h1;
+ Hidden2<Hide, double, char> h2(1, 2);
+}