/// \brief Return true if the specified macro definition is equal to
/// this macro in spelling, arguments, and whitespace.
///
- /// This is used to emit duplicate definition warnings. This implements the rules
- /// in C99 6.10.3.
- bool isIdenticalTo(const MacroInfo &Other, Preprocessor &PP) const;
+ /// \param Syntactically if true, the macro definitions can be identical even
+ /// if they use different identifiers for the function macro parameters.
+ /// Otherwise the comparison is lexical and this implements the rules in
+ /// C99 6.10.3.
+ bool isIdenticalTo(const MacroInfo &Other, Preprocessor &PP,
+ bool Syntactically) const;
/// \brief Set or clear the isBuiltinMacro flag.
void setIsBuiltinMacro(bool Val = true) {
// If the current macro definition is the same as the predefined macro
// definition, it's okay.
if (LatestDef.getMacroInfo() == PredefinedDef.getMacroInfo() ||
- LatestDef.getMacroInfo()->isIdenticalTo(*PredefinedDef.getMacroInfo(),PP))
+ LatestDef.getMacroInfo()->isIdenticalTo(*PredefinedDef.getMacroInfo(),PP,
+ /*Syntactically=*/true))
return;
// The macro definitions differ.
return DefinitionLength;
}
-// isIdenticalTo - Return true if the specified macro definition is equal to
-// this macro in spelling, arguments, and whitespace. This is used to emit
-// duplicate definition warnings. This implements the rules in C99 6.10.3.
-//
-bool MacroInfo::isIdenticalTo(const MacroInfo &Other, Preprocessor &PP) const {
+/// \brief Return true if the specified macro definition is equal to
+/// this macro in spelling, arguments, and whitespace.
+///
+/// \param Syntactically if true, the macro definitions can be identical even
+/// if they use different identifiers for the function macro parameters.
+/// Otherwise the comparison is lexical and this implements the rules in
+/// C99 6.10.3.
+bool MacroInfo::isIdenticalTo(const MacroInfo &Other, Preprocessor &PP,
+ bool Syntactically) const {
+ bool Lexically = !Syntactically;
+
// Check # tokens in replacement, number of args, and various flags all match.
if (ReplacementTokens.size() != Other.ReplacementTokens.size() ||
getNumArgs() != Other.getNumArgs() ||
isGNUVarargs() != Other.isGNUVarargs())
return false;
- // Check arguments.
- for (arg_iterator I = arg_begin(), OI = Other.arg_begin(), E = arg_end();
- I != E; ++I, ++OI)
- if (*I != *OI) return false;
+ if (Lexically) {
+ // Check arguments.
+ for (arg_iterator I = arg_begin(), OI = Other.arg_begin(), E = arg_end();
+ I != E; ++I, ++OI)
+ if (*I != *OI) return false;
+ }
// Check all the tokens.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = ReplacementTokens.size(); i != e; ++i) {
// If this is an identifier, it is easy.
if (A.getIdentifierInfo() || B.getIdentifierInfo()) {
- if (A.getIdentifierInfo() != B.getIdentifierInfo())
+ if (A.getIdentifierInfo() == B.getIdentifierInfo())
+ continue;
+ if (Lexically)
+ return false;
+ // With syntactic equivalence the parameter names can be different as long
+ // as they are used in the same place.
+ int AArgNum = getArgumentNum(A.getIdentifierInfo());
+ int BArgNum = Other.getArgumentNum(B.getIdentifierInfo());
+ if (AArgNum == -1 || AArgNum != BArgNum)
return false;
continue;
}
if (OtherMI->isBuiltinMacro())
Diag(MacroNameTok, diag::ext_pp_redef_builtin_macro);
// Macros must be identical. This means all tokens and whitespace
- // separation must be the same. C99 6.10.3.2.
+ // separation must be the same. C99 6.10.3p2.
else if (!OtherMI->isAllowRedefinitionsWithoutWarning() &&
- !MI->isIdenticalTo(*OtherMI, *this)) {
+ !MI->isIdenticalTo(*OtherMI, *this, /*Syntactic=*/LangOpts.MicrosoftExt)) {
Diag(MI->getDefinitionLoc(), diag::ext_pp_macro_redef)
<< MacroNameTok.getIdentifierInfo();
Diag(OtherMI->getDefinitionLoc(), diag::note_previous_definition);
MacroDirective::DefInfo PrevDef = Prev->getDefinition();
MacroInfo *PrevMI = PrevDef.getMacroInfo();
MacroInfo *NewMI = DefMD->getInfo();
- if (NewMI != PrevMI && !PrevMI->isIdenticalTo(*NewMI, PP)) {
+ if (NewMI != PrevMI && !PrevMI->isIdenticalTo(*NewMI, PP,
+ /*Syntactically=*/true)) {
// Before marking the macros as ambiguous, check if this is a case where
// the system macro uses a not identical definition compared to a macro
// from the clang headers. For example:
#define LEFT_RIGHT_DIFFERENT3 float
#define LEFT_RIGHT_DIFFERENT float
+
+#define FN_ADD(a,b) (a+b)
#undef TOP_RIGHT_REDEF
#define TOP_RIGHT_REDEF float
+
+#define FN_ADD(x, y) (x+y)
void test3() {
double d;
LEFT_RIGHT_DIFFERENT *dp = &d; // okay
+ int x = FN_ADD(1,2);
}
#ifndef TOP_RIGHT_UNDEF
#define FUNC_LIKE3(a) ( a) // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
#define FUNC_LIKE3(a) (a) // expected-warning {{'FUNC_LIKE3' macro redefined}}
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-extensions -DMS_EXT %s -Eonly -verify
+#ifndef MS_EXT
+// This should under C99.
+#define FUNC_LIKE4(a,b) (a+b) // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
+#define FUNC_LIKE4(x,y) (x+y) // expected-warning {{'FUNC_LIKE4' macro redefined}}
+#else
+// This shouldn't under MS extensions.
+#define FUNC_LIKE4(a,b) (a+b)
+#define FUNC_LIKE4(x,y) (x+y)
+
+// This should.
+#define FUNC_LIKE5(a,b) (a+b) // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
+#define FUNC_LIKE5(x,y) (y+x) // expected-warning {{'FUNC_LIKE5' macro redefined}}
+#endif