list-initialization that gets converted to some form other than an
InitListExpr. CXXTemporaryObjectExpr is a special case here, because it
represents a fused CXXFunctionalCastExpr + CXXConstructExpr. That, in
itself, is probably a design error...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@227377
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
void StmtPrinter::VisitCXXFunctionalCastExpr(CXXFunctionalCastExpr *Node) {
Node->getType().print(OS, Policy);
- OS << "(";
+ // If there are no parens, this is list-initialization, and the braces are
+ // part of the syntax of the inner construct.
+ if (Node->getLParenLoc().isValid())
+ OS << "(";
PrintExpr(Node->getSubExpr());
- OS << ")";
+ if (Node->getLParenLoc().isValid())
+ OS << ")";
}
void StmtPrinter::VisitCXXBindTemporaryExpr(CXXBindTemporaryExpr *Node) {
void StmtPrinter::VisitCXXTemporaryObjectExpr(CXXTemporaryObjectExpr *Node) {
Node->getType().print(OS, Policy);
- OS << "(";
+ if (Node->isListInitialization())
+ OS << "{";
+ else
+ OS << "(";
for (CXXTemporaryObjectExpr::arg_iterator Arg = Node->arg_begin(),
ArgEnd = Node->arg_end();
Arg != ArgEnd; ++Arg) {
OS << ", ";
PrintExpr(*Arg);
}
- OS << ")";
+ if (Node->isListInitialization())
+ OS << "}";
+ else
+ OS << ")";
}
void StmtPrinter::VisitLambdaExpr(LambdaExpr *Node) {
Expr *Inner = Result.get();
if (CXXBindTemporaryExpr *BTE = dyn_cast_or_null<CXXBindTemporaryExpr>(Inner))
Inner = BTE->getSubExpr();
- if (isa<InitListExpr>(Inner)) {
- // If the list-initialization doesn't involve a constructor call, we'll get
- // the initializer-list (with corrected type) back, but that's not what we
- // want, since it will be treated as an initializer list in further
- // processing. Explicitly insert a cast here.
+ if (!isa<CXXTemporaryObjectExpr>(Inner)) {
+ // If we created a CXXTemporaryObjectExpr, that node also represents the
+ // functional cast. Otherwise, create an explicit cast to represent
+ // the syntactic form of a functional-style cast that was used here.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Creating a CXXFunctionalCastExpr around a CXXConstructExpr
+ // would give a more consistent AST representation than using a
+ // CXXTemporaryObjectExpr. It's also weird that the functional cast
+ // is sometimes handled by initialization and sometimes not.
QualType ResultType = Result.get()->getType();
Result = CXXFunctionalCastExpr::Create(
Context, ResultType, Expr::getValueKindForType(TInfo->getType()), TInfo,
CK_NoOp, Result.get(), /*Path=*/nullptr, LParenLoc, RParenLoc);
}
- // FIXME: Improve AST representation?
return Result;
}
// CHECK: struct {{\[\[gnu::visibility\(\"hidden\"\)\]\]}} S;
struct [[gnu::visibility("hidden")]] S;
}
+
+// CHECK: struct CXXFunctionalCastExprPrint fce = CXXFunctionalCastExprPrint{ };
+struct CXXFunctionalCastExprPrint {} fce = CXXFunctionalCastExprPrint{};
+
+// CHECK: struct CXXTemporaryObjectExprPrint toe = CXXTemporaryObjectExprPrint{};
+struct CXXTemporaryObjectExprPrint { CXXTemporaryObjectExprPrint(); } toe = CXXTemporaryObjectExprPrint{};
template<typename T> void g() { int k = f({0}); }
template void g<int>();
}
+
+namespace TemporaryInitListSourceRange_PR22367 {
+ struct A {
+ constexpr A() {}
+ A(std::initializer_list<int>); // expected-note {{here}}
+ };
+ constexpr int f(A) { return 0; }
+ constexpr int k = f( // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
+ // The point of this test is to check that the caret points to
+ // 'std::initializer_list', not to '{0}'.
+ std::initializer_list // expected-note {{constructor}}
+ <int>
+ {0}
+ );
+}