// FIXME: always querying the result type is just an
// approximation; some nodes' legality is determined by the
// operand or other means. There's no good way to find out though.
- if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISDOpcode,
- EVT::getEVT(TruncUser->getType(), true)))
+ if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(
+ ISDOpcode, TLI.getValueType(TruncUser->getType(), true)))
continue;
// Don't bother for PHI nodes.
%struct = insertvalue %foo undef, i8 %byte, 0
ret %"foo" %struct
}
+
+define i64* @test_merge_PR21548(i32 %a, i64* %p1, i64* %p2, i64* %p3) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test_merge_PR21548
+ %as = lshr i32 %a, 3
+ %Tr = trunc i32 %as to i1
+ br i1 %Tr, label %BB2, label %BB3
+
+BB2:
+ ; Similarly to above:
+ ; CodeGenPrepare was requesting the EVT for i8* to determine
+ ; whether the select user of the trunc was legal. This asserted.
+
+; CHECK: select i1 {{%.*}}, i64* %p1, i64* %p2
+ %p = select i1 %Tr, i64* %p1, i64* %p2
+ ret i64* %p
+
+BB3:
+ ret i64* %p3
+}