For example, given:
#define bool _Bool
_Bool i;
void fn() { 1; }
-ast-print produced:
tmp.c:3:13: warning: expression result unused
void fn() { 1; }
^
bool i;
void fn() {
1;
}
That fails to compile because bool is undefined.
Details:
Diagnostics print _Bool as bool when the latter is defined as the
former. However, diagnostics were altering the printing policy for
-ast-print as well. The printed source was then invalid because the
preprocessor eats the bool definition.
Problematic diagnostics included suppressed warnings (e.g., add
-Wno-unused-value to the above example), including those that are
suppressed by default.
This patch fixes this bug and cleans up some related comments.
Reviewed by: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45093
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@332275
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
void checkPartialSpecializationVisibility(SourceLocation Loc,
NamedDecl *Spec);
- /// Retrieve a suitable printing policy.
+ /// Retrieve a suitable printing policy for diagnostics.
PrintingPolicy getPrintingPolicy() const {
return getPrintingPolicy(Context, PP);
}
- /// Retrieve a suitable printing policy.
+ /// Retrieve a suitable printing policy for diagnostics.
static PrintingPolicy getPrintingPolicy(const ASTContext &Ctx,
const Preprocessor &PP);
<< DC->getPrimaryContext() << "\n";
} else
Out << "Not a DeclContext\n";
- } else if (OutputKind == Print)
- D->print(Out, /*Indentation=*/0, /*PrintInstantiation=*/true);
- else if (OutputKind != None)
+ } else if (OutputKind == Print) {
+ PrintingPolicy Policy(D->getASTContext().getLangOpts());
+ D->print(Out, Policy, /*Indentation=*/0, /*PrintInstantiation=*/true);
+ } else if (OutputKind != None)
D->dump(Out, OutputKind == DumpFull);
}
PrintingPolicy Sema::getPrintingPolicy(const ASTContext &Context,
const Preprocessor &PP) {
PrintingPolicy Policy = Context.getPrintingPolicy();
- // Our printing policy is copied over the ASTContext printing policy whenever
- // a diagnostic is emitted, so recompute it.
+ // In diagnostics, we print _Bool as bool if the latter is defined as the
+ // former.
Policy.Bool = Context.getLangOpts().Bool;
if (!Policy.Bool) {
if (const MacroInfo *BoolMacro = PP.getMacroInfo(Context.getBoolName())) {
}
}
- // Set up the context's printing policy based on our current state.
+ // Copy the diagnostic printing policy over the ASTContext printing policy.
+ // TODO: Stop doing that. See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45093#1090292
Context.setPrintingPolicy(getPrintingPolicy());
// Emit the diagnostic.
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -ast-print %s -xc -DDEF_BOOL_CBOOL \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=BOOL-AS-CBOOL,CBOOL
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -ast-print %s -xc -DDEF_BOOL_CBOOL -DDIAG \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=BOOL-AS-CBOOL,CBOOL
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -ast-print %s -xc -DDEF_BOOL_INT \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=BOOL-AS-INT,CBOOL
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -ast-print %s -xc -DDEF_BOOL_INT -DDIAG \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=BOOL-AS-INT,CBOOL
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -ast-print %s -xc++ \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=BOOL-AS-BOOL
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -ast-print %s -xc++ -DDIAG \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=BOOL-AS-BOOL
+
+#if DEF_BOOL_CBOOL
+# define bool _Bool
+#elif DEF_BOOL_INT
+# define bool int
+#endif
+
+// BOOL-AS-CBOOL: _Bool i;
+// BOOL-AS-INT: int i;
+// BOOL-AS-BOOL: bool i;
+bool i;
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+// CBOOL: _Bool j;
+_Bool j;
+#endif
+
+// Induce a diagnostic (and verify we actually managed to do so), which used to
+// permanently alter the -ast-print printing policy for _Bool. How bool is
+// defined by the preprocessor is examined only once per compilation, when the
+// diagnostic is emitted, and it used to affect the entirety of -ast-print, so
+// test only one definition of bool per compilation.
+#if DIAG
+void fn() { 1; } // expected-warning {{expression result unused}}
+#else
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+#endif