Summary:
Before r349976, MC ignored such directives when producing an object file
and asserted when re-producing textual assembly output. I turned this
assertion into a hard error in both cases in r349976, but this makes it
unnecessarily difficult to write a single assembly file that supports
both MachO and other object formats that support .file. A user reported
this as PR40578, and we decided to go back to ignoring the directive.
Fixes PR40578
Reviewers: mstorsjo
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57772
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@353218
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
}
if (FileNumber == -1) {
- if (!getContext().getAsmInfo()->hasSingleParameterDotFile())
- return Error(DirectiveLoc,
- "target does not support '.file' without a number");
- getStreamer().EmitFileDirective(Filename);
+ // Ignore the directive if there is no number and the target doesn't support
+ // numberless .file directives. This allows some portability of assembler
+ // between different object file formats.
+ if (getContext().getAsmInfo()->hasSingleParameterDotFile())
+ getStreamer().EmitFileDirective(Filename);
} else {
// In case there is a -g option as well as debug info from directive .file,
// we turn off the -g option, directly use the existing debug info instead.
+++ /dev/null
-// RUN: not llvm-mc -triple i386-apple-darwin9 %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-
-// Previously this crashed MC.
-
-// CHECK: error: target does not support '.file' without a number
-
- .file "dir/foo"
- nop
// RUN: llvm-mc -triple i386-apple-darwin9 %s -filetype=obj -o - | llvm-readobj -s -section-data | FileCheck %s
+// This number-less file directive is ignored on MachO.
+ .file "bar/baz.s"
+
.file 1 "dir/foo"
nop