In the comparison, both clang and GCC are popular and widely adopted. This is no...

This whole doc should really be looked at.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index e8b14923b688313bfe6fd25ac0631b78f780ea2d..afc321e061910b0d8efb72bc63179ff33a510946 100644 (file)
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
     <li>GCC supports languages that clang does not aim to, such as Java, Ada,
         FORTRAN, etc.</li>
     <li>GCC supports more targets than LLVM.</li>
-    <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
     </ul>
     
     <p>Pro's of clang vs GCC:</p>