2.4.x patch: trunk works
+1 covener, jim, ylavic
+ *) SECURITY: CVE-2015-0253 (cve.mitre.org)
+ core: Fix a crash introduced in with ErrorDocument 400 pointing
+ to a local URL-path with the INCLUDES filter active, introduced
+ in 2.4.11. PR 57531. [Yann Ylavic]
+ trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1664205
+ 2.4.x patch: trunk works
+ +1 covener, jim, ylavic
+
+
PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~minfrin/httpd-core-errordocument24-3.patch
+1: minfrin
- *) SECURITY: CVE-2015-0253 (cve.mitre.org)
- core: Fix a crash introduced in with ErrorDocument 400 pointing
- to a local URL-path with the INCLUDES filter active, introduced
- in 2.4.11. PR 57531. [Yann Ylavic]
- trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1664205
- 2.4.x patch: trunk works
- +1 covener, jim, ylavic
- ylavic: I removed r1664576 which is trunk only since HttpProtocol
- directive (conformance) is not in 2.4.x, consequently not
- a failing path in read_request_line()... Hence I also
- restored Jim's vote (removed in r1665109 when r1664576 was
- added), and kept Eric's and mine. Good to go?
-
*) mod_proxy_balancer: Fix HTML of balancer-manager. Bugz: 55466
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1664356
2.4.x patch: trunk works
reverse and forward proxies.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1658765
2.4.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES)
- +1: ylavic
+ +1: ylavic, covener
*) mod_proxy_http: Don't expect the backend to ack the "Connection: close" to
finally close those not meant to be kept alive by SetEnv proxy-nokeepalive
or force-proxy-request-1.0.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1658760 (partial, ap_proxy_clear_connection() raises no error in 2.4.x)
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-mod_proxy_http-nokeepalive_close.patch
- +1: ylavic
+ +1: ylavic, covener
*) mod_proxy_connect/wstunnel: If both client and backend sides get readable
at the same time, don't lose errors occuring while forwarding on the first
http://svn.apache.org/r1657638
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-mod_proxy-transfer.patch
+1: ylavic
+ covener: I noticed while reviewing that rv is not used in ap_log_rerror at least
+ in the path context. If it had, the |= would have dropped the strerror. Think
+ there's any risk in having rv like that floating around?
OTHER PROPOSALS