DefineBuiltinMacro(Buf, "__int64=long long");
DefineBuiltinMacro(Buf, "__declspec(X)=");
}
+ // Directly modeled after the attribute-based implementation in GCC.
+ if (PP.getLangOptions().Blocks)
+ DefineBuiltinMacro(Buf, "__block=__attribute__((__blocks__(byref)))");
+ else
+ // This allows "__block int unusedVar;" even when blocks are disabled.
+ // This is modeled after GCC's handling of __strong/__weak.
+ DefineBuiltinMacro(Buf, "__block=");
+
// FIXME: Should emit a #line directive here.
}
Identifier.setKind(II.getTokenID());
// If this is an extension token, diagnose its use.
- // FIXME: tried (unsuccesfully) to shut this up when compiling with gnu99
- // For now, I'm just commenting it out (while I work on attributes).
- if (II.isExtensionToken() && Features.C99)
+ // We avoid diagnosing tokens that originate from macro definitions.
+ if (II.isExtensionToken() && Features.C99 && !DisableMacroExpansion)
Diag(Identifier, diag::ext_token_used);
}
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: clang -fsyntax-only -verify -pedantic %s
+
+// The preprocessor shouldn't warn about extensions within macro bodies that
+// aren't expanded.
+#define __block __attribute__((__blocks__(byref)))
+
+// This warning is entirely valid.
+__block int x; // expected-warning{{extension used}}
+
+void whatever() {}