SVal Result = EvalBinOp(Op, V2, MakeConstantVal(1U, U), U->getType());
// Conjure a new symbol if necessary to recover precision.
- if (Result.isUnknown() || !getConstraintManager().canReasonAbout(Result))
+ if (Result.isUnknown() || !getConstraintManager().canReasonAbout(Result)){
Result = ValMgr.getConjuredSymbolVal(Ex,
Builder->getCurrentBlockCount());
+
+ // If the value is a location, ++/-- should always preserve
+ // non-nullness. Check if the original value was non-null, and if so propagate
+ // that constraint.
+ if (Loc::IsLocType(U->getType())) {
+ SVal Constraint = EvalBinOp(BinaryOperator::EQ, V2,
+ ValMgr.makeZeroVal(U->getType()),
+ getContext().IntTy);
+
+ bool isFeasible = false;
+ Assume(state, Constraint, true, isFeasible);
+ if (!isFeasible) {
+ // It isn't feasible for the original value to be null.
+ // Propagate this constraint.
+ Constraint = EvalBinOp(BinaryOperator::EQ, Result,
+ ValMgr.makeZeroVal(U->getType()),
+ getContext().IntTy);
+
+ bool isFeasible = false;
+ state = Assume(state, Constraint, false, isFeasible);
+ assert(isFeasible && state);
+ }
+ }
+ }
state = BindExpr(state, U, U->isPostfix() ? V2 : Result);
*p = 1; // expected-warning{{Dereference of null pointer}}
}
+// For pointer arithmetic, --/++ should be treated as preserving non-nullness,
+// regardless of how well the underlying StoreManager reasons about pointer
+// arithmetic.
+// <rdar://problem/6777209>
+
+void rdar_6777209(char *p) {
+ if (p == 0)
+ return;
+
+ ++p;
+
+ // This branch should always be infeasible.
+ if (p == 0)
+ *p = 'c'; // no-warning
+}