Basically a regression after r316268.
However the diagnostic is correct, but the test coverage is bad.
So just like rL316500, introduce yet more tests,
and adjust the release notes.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35200
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@317421
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
tautological comparisons between integer variable of the type ``T`` and the
largest/smallest possible integer constant of that same type.
-- For C code, ``-Wsign-compare``, ``-Wtautological-constant-compare`` and
+- For C code, ``-Wsign-compare``, ``-Wsign-conversion``,
+ ``-Wtautological-constant-compare`` and
``-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare`` were adjusted to use the
underlying datatype of ``enum``.
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only -verify -DUNSIGNED -Wsign-conversion %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-win32 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wsign-conversion %s
+
+// PR35200
+enum X { A,B,C};
+int f(enum X x) {
+#ifdef UNSIGNED
+ return x; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion changes signedness: 'enum X' to 'int'}}
+#else
+ // expected-no-diagnostics
+ return x;
+#endif
+}