PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
+ *) mod_proxy_fcgi: Add the support for the mod_proxy's flushpackets parameter.
+ trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1802040
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1807876
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1808014
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1805490
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1823886
+ 2.4.x: svn merge -c 1802040,1807876,1808014,1805490,1823886 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
+ +1: elukey, jim, ylavic
+ elukey: this patch has been requested a couple of times in the users@ mailing list,
+ but from my tests in trunk the async/set-aside core features would already
+ do the job without the need of this patch. I am proposing the backport
+ to allow more users to migrate away from mod_fastcgi.
PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
See also:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b924afe0fcc58a8636b753e630421bf6dc2080653a79575fd5fd641a@%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E
- *) mod_proxy_fcgi: Add the support for the mod_proxy's flushpackets parameter.
- trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1802040
- http://svn.apache.org/r1807876
- http://svn.apache.org/r1808014
- http://svn.apache.org/r1805490
- http://svn.apache.org/r1823886
- 2.4.x: svn merge -c 1802040,1807876,1808014,1805490,1823886 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
- +1: elukey, jim
- elukey: this patch has been requested a couple of times in the users@ mailing list,
- but from my tests in trunk the async/set-aside core features would already
- do the job without the need of this patch. I am proposing the backport
- to allow more users to migrate away from mod_fastcgi.
-
PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED
[ New entries should be added at the START of the list ]