5095 panic when adding a duplicate dbuf to dn_dbufs
Author: Alex Reece <alex@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Adam Leventhal <adam.leventhal@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Mattew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Reviewed by: Josef Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
References:
https://www.illumos.org/issues/5095
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/
86bb58a
Ported-by: Chris Dunlop <chris@onthe.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
* | |
* | |
* +--------> NOFILL -------+
+ *
+ * DB_SEARCH is an invalid state for a dbuf. It is used by dbuf_free_range
+ * to find all dbufs in a range of a dnode and must be less than any other
+ * dbuf_states_t (see comment on dn_dbufs in dnode.h).
*/
typedef enum dbuf_states {
+ DB_SEARCH = -1,
DB_UNCACHED,
DB_FILL,
DB_NOFILL,
/* pointer to most recent dirty record for this buffer */
dbuf_dirty_record_t *db_last_dirty;
- /* Creation time of dbuf (see comment in dbuf_compare). */
- hrtime_t db_creation;
-
/*
* Our link on the owner dnodes's dn_dbufs list.
* Protected by its dn_dbufs_mtx.
refcount_t dn_holds;
kmutex_t dn_dbufs_mtx;
- avl_tree_t dn_dbufs; /* descendent dbufs */
+ /*
+ * Descendent dbufs, ordered by dbuf_compare. Note that dn_dbufs
+ * can contain multiple dbufs of the same (level, blkid) when a
+ * dbuf is marked DB_EVICTING without being removed from
+ * dn_dbufs. To maintain the avl invariant that there cannot be
+ * duplicate entries, we order the dbufs by an arbitrary value -
+ * their address in memory. This means that dn_dbufs cannot be used to
+ * directly look up a dbuf. Instead, callers must use avl_walk, have
+ * a reference to the dbuf, or look up a non-existant node with
+ * db_state = DB_SEARCH (see dbuf_free_range for an example).
+ */
+ avl_tree_t dn_dbufs;
/* protected by dn_struct_rwlock */
struct dmu_buf_impl *dn_bonus; /* bonus buffer dbuf */
cv_init(&db->db_changed, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
refcount_create(&db->db_holds);
- db->db_creation = gethrtime();
-
return (0);
}
db_seach = kmem_alloc(sizeof (dmu_buf_impl_t), KM_SLEEP);
db_search->db_level = 0;
db_search->db_blkid = start_blkid;
- db_search->db_creation = 0;
+ db_search->db_state = DB_SEARCH;
mutex_enter(&dn->dn_dbufs_mtx);
if (start_blkid >= dn->dn_unlisted_l0_blkid && !freespill) {
if (d1->db_level < d2->db_level) {
return (-1);
- } else if (d1->db_level > d2->db_level) {
+ }
+ if (d1->db_level > d2->db_level) {
return (1);
}
if (d1->db_blkid < d2->db_blkid) {
return (-1);
- } else if (d1->db_blkid > d2->db_blkid) {
+ }
+ if (d1->db_blkid > d2->db_blkid) {
return (1);
}
- /*
- * If a dbuf is being evicted while dn_dbufs_mutex is not held, we set
- * the db_state to DB_EVICTING but do not remove it from dn_dbufs. If
- * another thread creates a dbuf of the same blkid before the dbuf is
- * removed from dn_dbufs, we can reach a state where there are two
- * dbufs of the same blkid and level in db_dbufs. To maintain the avl
- * invariant that there cannot be duplicate items, we distinguish
- * between these two dbufs based on the time they were created.
- */
- if (d1->db_creation < d2->db_creation) {
+ if (d1->db_state < d2->db_state) {
return (-1);
- } else if (d1->db_creation > d2->db_creation) {
+ }
+ if (d1->db_state > d2->db_state) {
return (1);
- } else {
- ASSERT3P(d1, ==, d2);
- return (0);
}
+
+ ASSERT3S(d1->db_state, !=, DB_SEARCH);
+ ASSERT3S(d2->db_state, !=, DB_SEARCH);
+
+ if ((uintptr_t)d1 < (uintptr_t)d2) {
+ return (-1);
+ }
+ if ((uintptr_t)d1 > (uintptr_t)d2) {
+ return (1);
+ }
+ return (0);
}
/* ARGSUSED */