APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/27 14:00:46 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/28 15:22:55 $]
Release:
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
+ * HP/UX 10.20: compile breakage in APR. Looks like it should be easy
+ to fix, probably just some extraneous #include's that are fouling
+ things up.
+ PR: 9457
+
* decide if the MMN bump was warranted
* Darwin: httpd won't start. Hangs looking up 0.0.0.0 during config
* Win32: httpd won't start. There was a command line args problem
that got fixed, but now something else is wrong.
+ Status: one problem here might be a "" argument being returned from
+ the rewrite_args hook getting caught by Jeff's patch to check
+ args more strictly.
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020525222410.02a629d0@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
<00ca01c2033e$f1c54c10$a6271b09@sashimi>
<5.1.0.14.2.20020524115533.02785e28@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
<COEELENBBCHBFEPPGDOPCEPPGPAA.ake@meepzor.com>
* To high-free patch or not to high-free patch?
+ Status: Cliff thinks we need more time to test this
+ code and sniff out any side-effects it may uncover and is
+ leaning toward 2.0.38 but will reserve final judgement
+ since it's as yet unclear how soon 2.0.37 will be ready.
+ (vote tally for 2.0.37: +1: Sander, Ian; -0: Brian, Cliff)
Message-ID: <JLEGKKNELMHCJPNMOKHOGEIIFOAA.striker@apache.org>
<1022371367.23007.13.camel@mypc1.pacbell.net>
* apr_brigade_write() is not flushing in all cases it should
Status: Cliff will fix this
- * need consensus on Cliff's /dev/random vs. /dev/urandom question.
- Is there a better alternative than picking strictly one or the other?
- Message-ID:
- <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205251718300.31784-100000@deepthought.cs.virginia.edu>
- <20020522202404.D27903@apache.org>
- <20020522210345.E2800@clove.org>
+ * /dev/random vs. /dev/urandom
+ Status: Cliff is working on a patch to make this configurable.
* server pushed CGI's not working. (Is this a showstopper??)
PR: 8482