[Modules] Correct test comment from obsolete earlier version of code. NFC

Summary:
Code committed in rL290219 went through a few iterations; test wound up with
stale comment.

Reviewers: doug.gregor, manmanren

Reviewed By: manmanren

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28790

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@292435 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/test/Modules/implicit-private-with-different-name.m b/test/Modules/implicit-private-with-different-name.m
index 3d8f937973f06b1130f965f9411bb9dedfbca724..c09d3979c3e1dfcc518822f081232640c2de4ae1 100644 (file)
--- a/test/Modules/implicit-private-with-different-name.m
+++ b/test/Modules/implicit-private-with-different-name.m
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 // Build PCH using A, with adjacent private module APrivate, which winds up being implicitly referenced
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t -F %S/Inputs/implicit-private-with-different-name -emit-pch -o %t-A.pch %s
 
-// Use the PCH with no explicit way to resolve PrivateA, still pick it up through MODULE_DIRECTORY reference in PCH control block
+// Use the PCH with no explicit way to resolve APrivate, still pick it up by automatic second-chance search for "A" with "Private" appended
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t -F %S/Inputs/implicit-private-with-different-name -include-pch %t-A.pch %s -fsyntax-only
 
 // Check the fixit