Update fsync FAQ item.

diff --git a/doc/FAQ b/doc/FAQ
index 3a63f7f38d6a8847fac4c63283a44dad209bd69e..5d07fff7e7e12873ca2c5a22e76f8178bd1d46bf 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/FAQ
+++ b/doc/FAQ
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 
                 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL
                                        
-   Last updated: Mon Jun 10 16:44:55 EDT 2002
+   Last updated: Mon Jun 10 22:22:31 EDT 2002
    
    Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
    
@@ -323,29 +323,16 @@
           reduce lock contention.
           
    Performance
-          PostgreSQL runs in two modes. Normal fsync mode flushes every
-          completed transaction to disk, guaranteeing that if the OS
-          crashes or loses power in the next few seconds, all your data
-          is safely stored on disk. In this mode, we are slower than most
-          commercial databases, partly because few of them do such
-          conservative flushing to disk in their default modes. In
-          no-fsync mode, we are usually faster than commercial databases,
-          though in this mode, an OS crash could cause data corruption.
-          We are working to provide an intermediate mode that suffers
-          less performance overhead than full fsync mode, and will allow
-          data integrity within 30 seconds of an OS crash.
+          PostgreSQL has performance similar to other commercial and open
+          source databases. it is faster for some things, slower for
+          others.
           In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are
           slower on inserts/updates because we have transaction overhead.
           Of course, MySQL does not have any of the features mentioned in
-          the Features section above. We are built for flexibility and
-          features, though we continue to improve performance through
-          profiling and source code analysis. There is an interesting Web
-          page comparing PostgreSQL to MySQL at
-          http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html
-          We handle each user connection by creating a Unix process.
-          Backend processes share data buffers and locking information.
-          With multiple CPUs, multiple backends can easily run on
-          different CPUs.
+          the Features section above. We are built for reliability and
+          features, though we continue to improve performance in every
+          release. There is an interesting Web page comparing PostgreSQL
+          to MySQL at http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html
           
    Reliability
           We realize that a DBMS must be reliable, or it is worthless. We

diff --git a/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html b/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html
index d40aa45f36a54d3b53ccc104f0fadd43a4894bd7..2f4a0e6a5a433aae0077d82362e1ff7fed23181e 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html
+++ b/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
   alink="#0000ff">
     <H1>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL</H1>
 
-    <P>Last updated: Mon Jun 10 16:44:55 EDT 2002</P>
+    <P>Last updated: Mon Jun 10 22:22:31 EDT 2002</P>
 
     <P>Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (<A href=
     "mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us">pgman@candle.pha.pa.us</A>)<BR>
@@ -425,32 +425,20 @@
 
       <DT><B>Performance</B></DT>
 
-      <DD>PostgreSQL runs in two modes. Normal <I>fsync</I> mode
-      flushes every completed transaction to disk, guaranteeing that if
-      the OS crashes or loses power in the next few seconds, all your
-      data is safely stored on disk. In this mode, we are slower than
-      most commercial databases, partly because few of them do such
-      conservative flushing to disk in their default modes. In
-      <I>no-fsync</I> mode, we are usually faster than commercial
-      databases, though in this mode, an OS crash could cause data
-      corruption. We are working to provide an intermediate mode that
-      suffers less performance overhead than full fsync mode, and will
-      allow data integrity within 30 seconds of an OS crash.<BR>
+      <DD>PostgreSQL has performance similar to other commercial and
+      open source databases. it is faster for some things, slower for
+      others.
       <BR>
-       In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are slower
+      In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are slower
       on inserts/updates because we have transaction overhead. Of
       course, MySQL does not have any of the features mentioned in the
-      <I>Features</I> section above. We are built for flexibility and
-      features, though we continue to improve performance through
-      profiling and source code analysis. There is an interesting Web
-      page comparing PostgreSQL to MySQL at <A href=
-      "http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html">http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html</A><BR>
+      <I>Features</I> section above. We are built for reliability and
+      features, though we continue to improve performance in every
+      release. There is an interesting Web page comparing PostgreSQL to
+      MySQL at <A href= "http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html">
+
+      http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html</A><BR>
 
-      <BR>
-       We handle each user connection by creating a Unix process.
-      Backend processes share data buffers and locking information.
-      With multiple CPUs, multiple backends can easily run on different
-      CPUs.<BR>
       <BR>
       </DD>