SourceLocation TemplateKWLoc,
const DeclarationNameInfo &NameInfo,
const TemplateArgumentListInfo *Args) {
+ assert(QualifierLoc && "should be created for dependent qualifiers");
std::size_t size = sizeof(DependentScopeDeclRefExpr);
if (Args)
size += ASTTemplateKWAndArgsInfo::sizeFor(Args->size());
if (R.empty()) {
// In Microsoft mode, if we are inside a template class member function
// whose parent class has dependent base classes, and we can't resolve
- // an identifier, then assume the identifier is type dependent. The
- // goal is to postpone name lookup to instantiation time to be able to
- // search into the type dependent base classes.
+ // an identifier, then assume the identifier is a member of a dependent
+ // base class. The goal is to postpone name lookup to instantiation time
+ // to be able to search into the type dependent base classes.
+ // FIXME: If we want 100% compatibility with MSVC, we will have delay all
+ // unqualified name lookup. Any name lookup during template parsing means
+ // clang might find something that MSVC doesn't. For now, we only handle
+ // the common case of members of a dependent base class.
if (getLangOpts().MicrosoftMode) {
CXXMethodDecl *MD = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(CurContext);
- if (MD && MD->getParent()->hasAnyDependentBases())
- return ActOnDependentIdExpression(SS, TemplateKWLoc, NameInfo,
- IsAddressOfOperand, TemplateArgs);
+ if (MD && MD->isInstance() && MD->getParent()->hasAnyDependentBases()) {
+ assert(SS.isEmpty() && "qualifiers should be already handled");
+ QualType ThisType = MD->getThisType(Context);
+ // Since the 'this' expression is synthesized, we don't need to
+ // perform the double-lookup check.
+ NamedDecl *FirstQualifierInScope = 0;
+ return Owned(CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr::Create(
+ Context, /*This=*/0, ThisType, /*IsArrow=*/true,
+ /*Op=*/SourceLocation(), SS.getWithLocInContext(Context),
+ TemplateKWLoc, FirstQualifierInScope, NameInfo, TemplateArgs));
+ }
}
// Don't diagnose an empty lookup for inline assmebly.
}
} // namespace PR12701
+
+namespace PR16014 {
+
+struct A {
+ int a;
+ static int sa;
+};
+template <typename T> struct B : T {
+ int foo() { return a; }
+ int *bar() { return &a; }
+ int baz() { return T::a; }
+ int T::*qux() { return &T::a; }
+ static int T::*stuff() { return &T::a; }
+ static int stuff1() { return T::sa; }
+ static int *stuff2() { return &T::sa; }
+};
+
+template <typename T> struct C : T {
+ int foo() { return b; } // expected-error {{no member named 'b' in 'PR16014::C<PR16014::A>'}}
+ int *bar() { return &b; } // expected-error {{no member named 'b' in 'PR16014::C<PR16014::A>'}}
+ int baz() { return T::b; } // expected-error {{no member named 'b' in 'PR16014::A'}}
+ int T::*qux() { return &T::b; } // expected-error {{no member named 'b' in 'PR16014::A'}}
+ int T::*fuz() { return &U::a; } // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'U'}}
+};
+
+template struct B<A>;
+template struct C<A>; // expected-note-re 1+ {{in instantiation of member function 'PR16014::C<PR16014::A>::.*' requested here}}
+
+template <typename T> struct D : T {
+ struct Inner {
+ int foo() {
+ // FIXME: MSVC can find this in D's base T! Even worse, if ::sa exists,
+ // clang will use it instead.
+ return sa; // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'sa'}}
+ }
+ };
+};
+template struct D<A>;
+
+}