There are really two issues here:

- Can we *ever* build a static binary?  That *is* a showstopper, I agree.
  And, Aaron has volunteered to fix this soon-ish.
- Separate from that, is the question whether we should we *always* build a
  static binary?  That I do not believe I *is* a showstopper.  So, let's
  make the distinction and call for a vote.

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@93162 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 39167a36bde8d112771115ecd96eb4f7687897a9..be905603142431bcba4a58af9af7b518aabcbd17 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 2.0 STATUS:                                             -*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/01 16:53:07 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/01 17:51:17 $]
 
 Release:
 
@@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
 
 RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:
 
+    * Should we always build binaries statically unless otherwise
+      indicated?
+        Message-ID: <20020129210006.B23512@Lithium.MeepZor.Com>
+
+      +1:  
+      -1:  Justin
+        
     * If the parent process dies, should the remaining child processes
       "gracefully" self-terminate.
         Message-ID: <3C58232C.FE91F19F@Golux.Com>