CalleeAttrs.removeAttribute(Attribute::SExt);
}
+ // Drop sext and zext return attributes if the result is not used.
+ // This enables tail calls for code like:
+ //
+ // define void @caller() {
+ // entry:
+ // %unused_result = tail call zeroext i1 @callee()
+ // br label %retlabel
+ // retlabel:
+ // ret void
+ // }
+ if (I->use_empty()) {
+ CalleeAttrs.removeAttribute(Attribute::SExt);
+ CalleeAttrs.removeAttribute(Attribute::ZExt);
+ }
+
// If they're still different, there's some facet we don't understand
// (currently only "inreg", but in future who knows). It may be OK but the
// only safe option is to reject the tail call.
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=arm64--- -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Check that we ignore the zeroext attribute on the return type of the tail
+; call, since the return value is unused. This happens during CodeGenPrepare in
+; dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts, which calls attributesPermitTailCall to check if
+; the attributes of the caller and the callee match.
+
+declare zeroext i1 @zcallee()
+define void @zcaller() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: name: zcaller
+entry:
+ br i1 undef, label %calllabel, label %retlabel
+calllabel:
+; CHECK: bb.1.calllabel:
+; CHECK-NOT: BL @zcallee
+; CHECK-NEXT: TCRETURNdi @zcallee
+ %unused_result = tail call zeroext i1 @zcallee()
+ br label %retlabel
+retlabel:
+ ret void
+}
+
+declare signext i1 @scallee()
+define void @scaller() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: name: scaller
+entry:
+ br i1 undef, label %calllabel, label %retlabel
+calllabel:
+; CHECK: bb.1.calllabel:
+; CHECK-NOT: BL @scallee
+; CHECK-NEXT: TCRETURNdi @scallee
+ %unused_result = tail call signext i1 @scallee()
+ br label %retlabel
+retlabel:
+ ret void
+}