Problem: Vim9: no error using heredoc for a number variable.
Solution: Add a type check. (closes #8627)
else if (expr[0] == '=' && expr[1] == '<' && expr[2] == '<')
{
list_T *l;
+ long cur_lnum = SOURCING_LNUM;
// HERE document
l = heredoc_get(eap, expr + 3, FALSE);
rettv_list_set(&rettv, l);
if (!eap->skip)
{
+ // errors are for the assignment, not the end marker
+ SOURCING_LNUM = cur_lnum;
op[0] = '=';
op[1] = NUL;
(void)ex_let_vars(eap->arg, &rettv, FALSE, semicolon, var_count,
[END]
CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1145: Missing heredoc end marker: END')
delfunc! g:Func
+
+ lines =<< trim END
+ var lines: number =<< trim STOP
+ aaa
+ bbb
+ STOP
+ END
+ CheckDefAndScriptFailure(lines, 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected number but got list<string>', 1)
enddef
def Test_var_func_call()
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+ 3239,
/**/
3238,
/**/
if (compile_assign_lhs(var_start, &lhs, cmdidx,
is_decl, heredoc, oplen, cctx) == FAIL)
goto theend;
- if (!heredoc)
+ if (heredoc)
+ {
+ SOURCING_LNUM = start_lnum;
+ if (lhs.lhs_has_type
+ && need_type(&t_list_string, lhs.lhs_type,
+ -1, 0, cctx, FALSE, FALSE) == FAIL)
+ goto theend;
+ }
+ else
{
if (cctx->ctx_skip == SKIP_YES)
{