[AMDGPU] With XNACK, cannot clause a load with result coalesced with operand

Summary:
With XNACK, an smem load whose result is coalesced with an operand (thus
it overwrites its own operand) cannot appear in a clause, because some
other instruction might XNACK and restart the whole clause.

The clause breaker already realized that an smem that overwrites an
operand cannot appear in a clause, and broke the clause. The problem
that this commit fixes is that the SIFormMemoryClauses optimization
formed a bundle with early clobber, which caused the earlier code that
set up the coalesced operand to be removed as dead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57008

Change-Id: I703c4d5b0bf7d6060222bec491f45c18bb3c0016

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351950 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp b/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp
index 85d497ec2cede9fc31b7f42dbdec1cfb2d78d677..2cbed99beb2ffe19168f4993bd4f0362675a9b7d 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp
@@ -118,6 +118,17 @@ static bool isValidClauseInst(const MachineInstr &MI, bool IsVMEMClause) {
     return false;
   if (!IsVMEMClause && !isSMEMClauseInst(MI))
     return false;
+  // If this is a load instruction where the result has been coalesced with an operand, then we cannot clause it.
+  for (const MachineOperand &ResMO : MI.defs()) {
+    unsigned ResReg = ResMO.getReg();
+    for (const MachineOperand &MO : MI.uses()) {
+      if (!MO.isReg() || MO.isDef())
+        continue;
+      if (MO.getReg() == ResReg)
+        return false;
+    }
+    break; // Only check the first def.
+  }
   return true;
 }
 

diff --git a/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/smem-no-clause-coalesced.mir b/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/smem-no-clause-coalesced.mir
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2906259
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/smem-no-clause-coalesced.mir
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# RUN: llc -march=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx902 -o - %s -run-pass si-form-memory-clauses -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck -check-prefix=XNACK %s
+
+# The SIFormMemoryClauses pass must not form a clause (indicated by BUNDLE)
+# from the two adjacent smem instructions, because the first one has its
+# result coalesced with an operand.
+
+# XNACK-LABEL: body:
+# XNACK-NOT: BUNDLE
+
+---
+name:            _amdgpu_cs_main
+alignment:       0
+exposesReturnsTwice: false
+legalized:       false
+regBankSelected: false
+selected:        false
+failedISel:      false
+tracksRegLiveness: true
+hasWinCFI:       false
+fixedStack:      []
+stack:           []
+constants:       []
+body:             |
+  bb.0:
+    liveins: $sgpr2, $sgpr3, $sgpr12, $sgpr13, $sgpr14, $vgpr0, $vgpr1
+
+    %0:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr1
+    %1:sgpr_32 = COPY $sgpr12
+    %2:sgpr_32 = COPY $sgpr3
+    undef %3.sub0:sgpr_128 = COPY $sgpr2
+    %4:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr0
+    %5:sgpr_32 = COPY $sgpr14
+    %6:sgpr_32 = COPY $sgpr13
+    %7:sreg_64_xexec = S_GETPC_B64
+    %7.sub0:sreg_64_xexec = COPY %1
+    %3.sub1:sgpr_128 = S_AND_B32 %2, 65535, implicit-def dead $scc
+    %3.sub3:sgpr_128 = S_MOV_B32 151468
+    %3.sub2:sgpr_128 = S_MOV_B32 -1
+    %7.sub0:sreg_64_xexec = S_LOAD_DWORD_IMM %7, 48, 0 :: (load 4 from `i8 addrspace(4)* undef`, addrspace 4)
+    %8:sreg_64_xexec = S_BUFFER_LOAD_DWORDX2_IMM %3, 640, 0 :: (dereferenceable invariant load 8)
+    undef %9.sub0:vreg_128 = V_LSHL_ADD_U32 %6, 4, %4, implicit $exec
+    %9.sub1:vreg_128 = V_LSHL_ADD_U32 %5, 4, %0, implicit $exec
+    S_ENDPGM
+
+...
+
+
+