LLVM/Clang basically don't use such comments and for Google-style,
include-lines are explicitly exempt from the column limit. Also, for
most cases, where the column limit is violated, the "better" solution
would be to move the comment to before the include, which clang-format
cannot do (yet).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@181191
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
if (!DryRun)
BBC->alignLines(Whitespaces);
Token.reset(BBC);
- } else if (Current.Type == TT_LineComment) {
+ } else if (Current.Type == TT_LineComment &&
+ (Current.Parent == NULL ||
+ Current.Parent->Type != TT_ImplicitStringLiteral)) {
Token.reset(new BreakableLineComment(SourceMgr, Current, StartColumn));
} else {
return 0;
"#include \"string.h\"\n"
"#include <a-a>\n"
"#include < path with space >\n"
+ "#include \"abc.h\" // this is included for ABC\n"
"#include \"some very long include paaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaath\"",
getLLVMStyleWithColumns(35));