--- /dev/null
+; XFAIL: *
+; REQUIRES: asserts
+; RUN: opt -S -enable-loop-simplifycfg-term-folding=true -indvars -loop-simplifycfg -debug-only=loop-simplifycfg -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-lcssa 2>&1 < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -S -enable-loop-simplifycfg-term-folding=true -passes='require<domtree>,loop(indvars,simplify-cfg)' -debug-only=loop-simplifycfg -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-lcssa 2>&1 < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -S -enable-loop-simplifycfg-term-folding=true -indvars -loop-simplifycfg -enable-mssa-loop-dependency=true -verify-memoryssa -debug-only=loop-simplifycfg -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-lcssa 2>&1 < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; This test demonstrates a bug in live blocks markup that is only catchable in
+; inter-pass interaction.
+define void @test(i1 %c) {
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test(
+
+entry:
+ br label %outer
+
+outer:
+ br i1 %c, label %to_fold, label %latch
+
+to_fold:
+ br i1 %c, label %latch, label %inner
+
+inner:
+ %iv = phi i32 [0, %to_fold], [%iv.next, %inner_latch]
+ %never = icmp sgt i32 %iv, 40
+ br i1 %never, label %inner_latch, label %undead
+
+inner_latch:
+ %iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
+ %cmp = icmp slt i32 %iv.next, 10
+ br i1 %cmp, label %inner, label %latch
+
+undead:
+ br label %latch
+
+latch:
+ br i1 true, label %outer, label %dead_exit
+
+dead_exit:
+ ret void
+}