/// run time.
Unevaluated,
- /// \brief The current expression and its subexpressions occur within a
- /// constant expression. Such a context is not potentially-evaluated in
- /// C++98, but is potentially-evaluated in C++11.
+ /// \brief The current context is "potentially evaluated" in C++11 terms,
+ /// but the expression is evaluated at compile-time (like the values of
+ /// cases in a switch statment).
ConstantEvaluated,
/// \brief The current expression is potentially evaluated at run time,
// not have a vtable.
if (!Class->isDynamicClass() || Class->isDependentContext() ||
CurContext->isDependentContext() ||
- ExprEvalContexts.back().Context == Unevaluated ||
- ExprEvalContexts.back().Context == ConstantEvaluated)
+ ExprEvalContexts.back().Context == Unevaluated)
return;
// Try to insert this class into the map.
switch (ExprEvalContexts.back().Context) {
case Unevaluated:
// We are in an expression that is not potentially evaluated; do nothing.
+ // (Depending on how you read the standard, we actually do need to do
+ // something here for null pointer constants, but the standard's
+ // definition of a null pointer constant is completely crazy.)
return;
case ConstantEvaluated:
- // We are in an expression that will be evaluated during translation; in
- // C++11, we need to define any functions which are used in case they're
- // constexpr, whereas in C++98, we only need to define static data members
- // of class templates.
- if (!getLangOptions().CPlusPlus ||
- (!getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x && !isa<VarDecl>(D)))
- return;
- break;
-
case PotentiallyEvaluated:
- // We are in a potentially-evaluated expression, so this declaration is
- // "used"; handle this below.
+ // We are in a potentially evaluated expression (or a constant-expression
+ // in C++03); we need to do implicit template instantiation, implicitly
+ // define class members, and mark most declarations as used.
break;
case PotentiallyEvaluatedIfUsed:
// Keep track of used but undefined variables. We make a hole in
// the warning for static const data members with in-line
// initializers.
+ // FIXME: The hole we make for static const data members is too wide!
+ // We need to implement the C++11 rules for odr-used.
if (Var->hasDefinition() == VarDecl::DeclarationOnly
&& Var->getLinkage() != ExternalLinkage
&& !(Var->isStaticDataMember() && Var->hasInit())) {
// If we are in an unevaluated context, like sizeof, skip adding a
// qualification.
- } else if (S.ExprEvalContexts.back().Context == Sema::Unevaluated ||
- S.ExprEvalContexts.back().Context == Sema::ConstantEvaluated) {
+ } else if (S.ExprEvalContexts.back().Context == Sema::Unevaluated) {
return type;
// If that failed, give an error and recover using __autoreleasing.