are forwarded to GCC.
- The later is unfortunate, as it prevents us from generally warning
about anything interesting on platforms that use a generic
toolchain. However, we can't do much better without significantly
complicating things, and generally we should have proper tool chain
definitions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67293
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
// FIXME: We need to handle canonicalization of the specified
// arch?
+ A->claim();
if (ArchNames.insert(Name))
Archs.push_back(Name);
}
<< types::getTypeName(Act->getType());
ActionList Inputs;
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = Archs.size(); i != e; ++i )
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = Archs.size(); i != e; ++i)
Inputs.push_back(new BindArchAction(Act, Archs[i]));
// Lipo if necessary, We do it this way because we need to set the
for (ArgList::const_iterator
it = Args.begin(), ie = Args.end(); it != ie; ++it) {
Arg *A = *it;
- if (A->getOption().hasForwardToGCC())
+ if (A->getOption().hasForwardToGCC()) {
+ // It is unfortunate that we have to claim here, as this means
+ // we will basically never report anything interesting for
+ // platforms using a generic gcc.
+ A->claim();
A->render(Args, CmdArgs);
+ }
}
RenderExtraToolArgs(CmdArgs);