be more clear about what we are comparing.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@44795 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index aa11b5fa2e25615dae57fc4063d70c4e5b304577..dc9f70d51c16b5c903a6e562273c41fe9950c0b7 100644 (file)
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
     <p>Building an entirely new compiler front-end is a big task, and it isn't\r
        always clear to people why we decided to do this.  Here we compare clang\r
        and its goals to other open source compiler front-ends that are\r
-       available.  We restrict the discussion to very specific technical points\r
-       to avoid controversy where possible.  Also, since software is infinitely\r
-       mutable, so focus on architectural issues that are impractical to fix\r
-       without a major rewrite, instead of talking about little details that\r
-       can be fixed with a reasonable amount of effort.</p>\r
+       available.  We restrict the discussion to very specific objective points\r
+       to avoid controversy where possible.  Also, software is infinitely\r
+       mutable, so we don't talk about little details that can be fixed with \r
+       a reasonable amount of effort: we'll talk about issues that are \r
+       difficult to fix for architectural or political reasons.</p>\r
        \r
     <p>The goal of this list is to describe how differences in goals lead to\r
        different strengths and weaknesses, not to make some compiler look bad.\r