Sema::BuildQualifiedDeclarationNameExpr(CXXScopeSpec &SS,
const DeclarationNameInfo &NameInfo,
bool IsAddressOfOperand) {
- DeclContext *DC;
- if (!(DC = computeDeclContext(SS, false)) || DC->isDependentContext())
+ DeclContext *DC = computeDeclContext(SS, false);
+ if (!DC)
return BuildDependentDeclRefExpr(SS, /*TemplateKWLoc=*/SourceLocation(),
NameInfo, /*TemplateArgs=*/0);
if (R.isAmbiguous())
return ExprError();
+ if (R.getResultKind() == LookupResult::NotFoundInCurrentInstantiation)
+ return BuildDependentDeclRefExpr(SS, /*TemplateKWLoc=*/SourceLocation(),
+ NameInfo, /*TemplateArgs=*/0);
+
if (R.empty()) {
Diag(NameInfo.getLoc(), diag::err_no_member)
<< NameInfo.getName() << DC << SS.getRange();
// This test concerns the identity of dependent types within the
// canonical type system, specifically focusing on the difference
-// between members of the current instantiation and membmers of an
+// between members of the current instantiation and members of an
// unknown specialization. This considers C++ [temp.type], which
// specifies type equivalence within a template, and C++0x
// [temp.dep.type], which defines what it means to be a member of the
template<typename X<XT>::Enum>
class X<XT>::Inner { };
}
+
+namespace RebuildDependentScopeDeclRefExpr {
+ template<int> struct N {};
+ template<typename T> struct X {
+ static const int thing = 0;
+ N<thing> data();
+ N<thing> foo();
+ };
+ template<typename T> N<X<T>::thing> X<T>::data() {}
+ // FIXME: We should issue a typo-correction here.
+ template<typename T> N<X<T>::think> X<T>::foo() {} // expected-error {{no member named 'think' in 'X<T>'}}
+}