Summary:
But still handle them the same way since I don't know how they differ on
this target.
No functional change intended.
Reviewers: kparzysz, adasgupt
Reviewed By: kparzysz, adasgupt
Subscribers: colinl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8204
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232374
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
// constraint codes for all targets.
Constraint_Unknown = 0,
Constraint_m,
- Constraint_o, // Unused at the moment since Constraint_m is always used.
- Constraint_v, // Unused at the moment since Constraint_m is always used.
+ Constraint_o,
+ Constraint_v,
Constraints_Max = Constraint_v,
Constraints_ShiftAmount = 16,
SDValue Inp = Op, Res;
switch (ConstraintID) {
- case InlineAsm::Constraint_o: // Offsetable.
- case InlineAsm::Constraint_v: // Not offsetable.
default:
return true;
- case InlineAsm::Constraint_m: // Memory.
+ case InlineAsm::Constraint_o: // Offsetable.
+ case InlineAsm::Constraint_v: // Not offsetable.
+ case InlineAsm::Constraint_m: // Memory.
if (SelectAddrFI(Inp, Res))
OutOps.push_back(Res);
else
unsigned getInlineAsmMemConstraint(
const std::string &ConstraintCode) const override {
- // FIXME: Map different constraints differently.
- return InlineAsm::Constraint_m;
+ if (ConstraintCode == "o")
+ return InlineAsm::Constraint_o;
+ else if (ConstraintCode == "v")
+ return InlineAsm::Constraint_v;
+ return TargetLowering::getInlineAsmMemConstraint(ConstraintCode);
}
// Intrinsics