This Assert thought that a given rel couldn't be both leaf and
non-leaf, but it turns out that in some unusual plan trees
that's wrong, so remove it.
The lack of testing for cases like that is quite concerning ---
there is little reason for confidence that there aren't other
bugs in the area. But developing a stable test case seems
rather difficult, and in any case we don't need this Assert.
David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJGNTeOkdk=UVuMugmKL7M=owgt4nNr1wjxMg1F+mHsXyLCzFA@mail.gmail.com
Assert(rti < root->simple_rel_array_size);
/* No duplicates please */
Assert(relid_subpart_map[rti] == 0);
- /* Same rel cannot be both leaf and non-leaf */
- Assert(relid_subplan_map[rti] == 0);
relid_subpart_map[rti] = i++;
}