Summary:
isFusion returns true if the subtarget supports any kind of instruction
fusion, similar to ARMSubtarget::isFusion. This was suggested in D34142.
This changes the current behavior slightly, because the macro fusion mutation
is now added to the PostRA MachineScheduler in case the subtarget supports
any kind of fusion. I think that makes sense because if the PostRA
MachineScheduler is run, there is potential that instructions scheduled back to
back are re-scheduled.
Reviewers: evandro, t.p.northover, joelkevinjones, joel_k_jones, steleman
Reviewed By: joelkevinjones
Subscribers: joel_k_jones, aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34958
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@307842
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
bool hasArithmeticCbzFusion() const { return HasArithmeticCbzFusion; }
bool hasFuseAES() const { return HasFuseAES; }
bool hasFuseLiterals() const { return HasFuseLiterals; }
+
+ /// \brief Return true if the CPU supports any kind of instruction fusion.
+ bool hasFusion() const {
+ return hasArithmeticBccFusion() || hasArithmeticCbzFusion() ||
+ hasFuseAES() || hasFuseLiterals();
+ }
+
bool useRSqrt() const { return UseRSqrt; }
unsigned getMaxInterleaveFactor() const { return MaxInterleaveFactor; }
unsigned getVectorInsertExtractBaseCost() const {
ScheduleDAGInstrs *
createPostMachineScheduler(MachineSchedContext *C) const override {
const AArch64Subtarget &ST = C->MF->getSubtarget<AArch64Subtarget>();
- if (ST.hasFuseAES() || ST.hasFuseLiterals()) {
+ if (ST.hasFusion()) {
// Run the Macro Fusion after RA again since literals are expanded from
// pseudos then (v. addPreSched2()).
ScheduleDAGMI *DAG = createGenericSchedPostRA(C);