[analyzer] Handle CXXTemporaryObjectExprs in compound literals.

This occurs because in C++11 the compound literal syntax can trigger a
constructor call via list-initialization. That is, "Point{x, y}" and
"(Point){x, y}" end up being equivalent. If this occurs, the inner
CXXConstructExpr will have already handled the object construction; the
CompoundLiteralExpr just needs to propagate that value forwards.

<rdar://problem/13804098>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@181213 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
index 2d52c01e1d20be79aeb2814d8a9c9a7799ffaf4a..67aeab60033f95ce31282863caf34582a89241db 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
@@ -403,26 +403,32 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitCompoundLiteralExpr(const CompoundLiteralExpr *CL,
                                           ExplodedNodeSet &Dst) {
   StmtNodeBuilder B(Pred, Dst, *currBldrCtx);
 
-  const InitListExpr *ILE 
-    = cast<InitListExpr>(CL->getInitializer()->IgnoreParens());
+  ProgramStateRef State = Pred->getState();
+  const LocationContext *LCtx = Pred->getLocationContext();
+
+  const Expr *Init = CL->getInitializer();
+  SVal V = State->getSVal(CL->getInitializer(), LCtx);
   
-  ProgramStateRef state = Pred->getState();
-  SVal ILV = state->getSVal(ILE, Pred->getLocationContext());
-  const LocationContext *LC = Pred->getLocationContext();
-  state = state->bindCompoundLiteral(CL, LC, ILV);
-
-  // Compound literal expressions are a GNU extension in C++.
-  // Unlike in C, where CLs are lvalues, in C++ CLs are prvalues,
-  // and like temporary objects created by the functional notation T()
-  // CLs are destroyed at the end of the containing full-expression.
-  // HOWEVER, an rvalue of array type is not something the analyzer can
-  // reason about, since we expect all regions to be wrapped in Locs.
-  // So we treat array CLs as lvalues as well, knowing that they will decay
-  // to pointers as soon as they are used.
-  if (CL->isGLValue() || CL->getType()->isArrayType())
-    B.generateNode(CL, Pred, state->BindExpr(CL, LC, state->getLValue(CL, LC)));
-  else
-    B.generateNode(CL, Pred, state->BindExpr(CL, LC, ILV));
+  if (isa<CXXConstructExpr>(Init)) {
+    // No work needed. Just pass the value up to this expression.
+  } else {
+    assert(isa<InitListExpr>(Init));
+    Loc CLLoc = State->getLValue(CL, LCtx);
+    State = State->bindLoc(CLLoc, V);
+
+    // Compound literal expressions are a GNU extension in C++.
+    // Unlike in C, where CLs are lvalues, in C++ CLs are prvalues,
+    // and like temporary objects created by the functional notation T()
+    // CLs are destroyed at the end of the containing full-expression.
+    // HOWEVER, an rvalue of array type is not something the analyzer can
+    // reason about, since we expect all regions to be wrapped in Locs.
+    // So we treat array CLs as lvalues as well, knowing that they will decay
+    // to pointers as soon as they are used.
+    if (CL->isGLValue() || CL->getType()->isArrayType())
+      V = CLLoc;
+  }
+
+  B.generateNode(CL, Pred, State->BindExpr(CL, LCtx, V));
 }
 
 void ExprEngine::VisitDeclStmt(const DeclStmt *DS, ExplodedNode *Pred,

diff --git a/test/Analysis/temporaries.cpp b/test/Analysis/temporaries.cpp
index 32a4d3bef46575eff765cd4b100b21d66c373852..efc0825470cd32e3c2820e8530c682ef9a30084d 100644 (file)
--- a/test/Analysis/temporaries.cpp
+++ b/test/Analysis/temporaries.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -w %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -w -std=c++03 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -w -std=c++11 %s
 
 extern bool clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
 
@@ -76,3 +77,35 @@ namespace rdar13281951 {
   }
 }
 
+namespace compound_literals {
+  struct POD {
+    int x, y;
+  };
+  struct HasCtor {
+    HasCtor(int x, int y) : x(x), y(y) {}
+    int x, y;
+  };
+  struct HasDtor {
+    int x, y;
+    ~HasDtor();
+  };
+  struct HasCtorDtor {
+    HasCtorDtor(int x, int y) : x(x), y(y) {}
+    ~HasCtorDtor();
+    int x, y;
+  };
+
+  void test() {
+    clang_analyzer_eval(((POD){1, 42}).y == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+    clang_analyzer_eval(((HasDtor){1, 42}).y == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+    clang_analyzer_eval(((HasCtor){1, 42}).y == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+
+    // FIXME: should be TRUE, but we don't inline the constructors of
+    // temporaries because we can't model their destructors yet.
+    clang_analyzer_eval(((HasCtorDtor){1, 42}).y == 42); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
+#endif
+  }
+}
+