trawick: Could we add r1673769 too?
ylavic: +1 with r1673769.
+ *) mpm_event: Allow for timer events duplicates.
+ trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1666468
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1666618
+ 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-event_timers_duplicates.patch
+ +1: ylavic
+ covener: what's the background here? What's currently broken?
+ ylavic: I expected to find a common compare function for both MPMs event
+ and motorz, but I now think that won't be the case (not the same
+ constraints for both since event does not apr_skiplist_remove(),
+ see http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=142714857911558&w=2 for
+ details). Hence I'm moving this backport back to proposals, it is
+ IMO the right fix to not lose timers registered in the same micro-
+ second (in MPM event).
+
OTHER PROPOSALS
* A list of further possible backports can be found at:
PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED
- *) mpm_event: Allow for timer events duplicates.
- trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1666468
- http://svn.apache.org/r1666618
- 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-event_timers_duplicates.patch
- +1: ylavic
- covener: what's the background here? What's currently broken?
-
PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED