It turns out that
-foo;
can be an objective C method declaration. So instead of the previous
solution, recognize objective C methods only if we are in a declaration
scope.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@177740
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
switch (Tok->FormatTok.Tok.getKind()) {
case tok::plus:
case tok::minus:
- // At the start of the line, +/- specify ObjectiveC method declarations.
- if (Tok->Children.empty() || Tok->Children[0].Children.empty())
- break; // Can't be an ObjectiveC method declaration.
- if (Tok->Parent == NULL && (Tok->Children[0].is(tok::l_paren) ||
- Tok->Children[0].Children[0].is(tok::colon)))
+ if (Tok->Parent == NULL && Line.MustBeDeclaration)
Tok->Type = TT_ObjCMethodSpecifier;
break;
case tok::colon:
}
bool UnwrappedLineParser::parseFile() {
- ScopedDeclarationState DeclarationState(*Line, DeclarationScopeStack,
- /*MustBeDeclaration=*/ true);
+ ScopedDeclarationState DeclarationState(
+ *Line, DeclarationScopeStack,
+ /*MustBeDeclaration=*/ !Line->InPPDirective);
bool Error = parseLevel(/*HasOpeningBrace=*/ false);
// Make sure to format the remaining tokens.
flushComments(true);
// If there's no return type (very rare in practice!), LLVM and Google style
// agree.
+ verifyFormat("- foo;");
verifyFormat("- foo:(int)f;");
verifyGoogleFormat("- foo:(int)foo;");
}