In the long run, these two might be independent or we might to only
allow specific combinations. Until we have a corresponding request,
however, it is hard to do the right thing and choose the right
configuration options. Thus, just don't touch the options yet and
just modify the behavior slightly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@239531
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
This applies to round brackets (parentheses), angle brackets and square
brackets. This will result in formattings like
-
- .. code-block:: c++
-
- someLongFunction(argument1,
- argument2);
+ \code
+ someLongFunction(argument1,
+ argument2);
+ \endcode
**AlignConsecutiveAssignments** (``bool``)
If ``true``, aligns consecutive assignments.
This will align the assignment operators of consecutive lines. This
will result in formattings like
-
- .. code-block:: c++
-
- int aaaa = 12;
- int b = 23;
- int ccc = 23;
+ \code
+ int aaaa = 12;
+ int b = 23;
+ int ccc = 23;
+ \endcode
**AlignEscapedNewlinesLeft** (``bool``)
If ``true``, aligns escaped newlines as far left as possible.
* ``SFS_None`` (in configuration: ``None``)
Never merge functions into a single line.
- * ``SFS_Inline`` (in configuration: ``Inline``)
- Only merge functions defined inside a class.
* ``SFS_Empty`` (in configuration: ``Empty``)
Only merge empty functions.
+ * ``SFS_Inline`` (in configuration: ``Inline``)
+ Only merge functions defined inside a class. Implies "empty".
* ``SFS_All`` (in configuration: ``All``)
Merge all functions fitting on a single line.
instead of as function calls.
These are expected to be macros of the form:
-
- .. code-block:: c++
-
- FOREACH(<variable-declaration>, ...)
- <loop-body>
+ \code
+ FOREACH(<variable-declaration>, ...)
+ <loop-body>
+ \endcode
For example: BOOST_FOREACH.
enum ShortFunctionStyle {
/// \brief Never merge functions into a single line.
SFS_None,
- /// \brief Only merge functions defined inside a class.
- SFS_Inline,
/// \brief Only merge empty functions.
SFS_Empty,
+ /// \brief Only merge functions defined inside a class. Implies "empty".
+ SFS_Inline,
/// \brief Merge all functions fitting on a single line.
SFS_All,
};
// If necessary, change to something smarter.
bool MergeShortFunctions =
Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine == FormatStyle::SFS_All ||
- (Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine == FormatStyle::SFS_Empty &&
+ (Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine >= FormatStyle::SFS_Empty &&
I[1]->First->is(tok::r_brace)) ||
(Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine == FormatStyle::SFS_Inline &&
TheLine->Level != 0);
" function inner2(a, b) { return a; }\n"
" inner2(a, b);\n"
"}");
+ verifyFormat("function f() {}");
}
TEST_F(FormatTestJS, ArrayLiterals) {
verifyFormat("export function fn() {\n"
" return 'fn';\n"
"}");
- verifyFormat("export function A() {\n"
- "}\n"
- "export default function B() {\n"
- "}\n"
- "export function C() {\n"
- "}");
+ verifyFormat("export function A() {}\n"
+ "export default function B() {}\n"
+ "export function C() {}");
verifyFormat("export const x = 12;");
verifyFormat("export default class X {}");
verifyFormat("export {X, Y} from 'some/module.js';");
verifyFormat("foo<Y>(a);");
verifyFormat("var x: X<Y>[];");
verifyFormat("class C extends D<E> implements F<G>, H<I> {}");
- verifyFormat("function f(a: List<any> = null) {\n}");
- verifyFormat("function f(): List<any> {\n}");
+ verifyFormat("function f(a: List<any> = null) {}");
+ verifyFormat("function f(): List<any> {}");
}
TEST_F(FormatTestJS, OptionalTypes) {
- verifyFormat("function x(a?: b, c?, d?) {\n}");
+ verifyFormat("function x(a?: b, c?, d?) {}");
verifyFormat("class X {\n"
" y?: z;\n"
" z?;\n"
" aaaaaaaa?: string,\n"
" aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?: boolean,\n"
" aaaaaa?: List<string>\n"
- "}) {\n"
- "}");
+ "}) {}");
}
TEST_F(FormatTestJS, IndexSignature) {