Token OpToken = Tok;
ConsumeToken();
+ if (!LHS.isInvalid() && isa<InitListExpr>(LHS.get())) {
+ Diag(OpToken, diag::err_init_list_bin_op)
+ << /*LHS*/0 << PP.getSpelling(OpToken) << LHS.get()->getSourceRange();
+ LHS = ExprError();
+ }
+
// Special case handling for the ternary operator.
ExprResult TernaryMiddle(true);
if (NextTokPrec == prec::Conditional) {
// Therefore we need some special-casing here.
// Also note that the third operand of the conditional operator is
// an assignment-expression in C++, and in C++11, we can have a
- // braced-init-list on the RHS of an assignment.
+ // braced-init-list on the RHS of an assignment. For better diagnostics,
+ // parse as if we were allowed braced-init-lists everywhere, and check that
+ // they only appear on the RHS of assignments later.
ExprResult RHS;
- if (getLang().CPlusPlus0x && MinPrec == prec::Assignment &&
- Tok.is(tok::l_brace)) {
- Diag(Tok, diag::warn_cxx98_compat_generalized_initializer_lists);
+ if (getLang().CPlusPlus0x && Tok.is(tok::l_brace))
RHS = ParseBraceInitializer();
- if (LHS.isInvalid() || RHS.isInvalid())
- return ExprError();
- // A braced-init-list can never be followed by more operators.
- return Actions.ActOnBinOp(getCurScope(), OpToken.getLocation(),
- OpToken.getKind(), LHS.take(), RHS.take());
- } else if (getLang().CPlusPlus && NextTokPrec <= prec::Conditional) {
+ else if (getLang().CPlusPlus && NextTokPrec <= prec::Conditional)
RHS = ParseAssignmentExpression();
- } else {
+ else
RHS = ParseCastExpression(false);
- }
if (RHS.isInvalid())
LHS = ExprError();
// more tightly with RHS than we do, evaluate it completely first.
if (ThisPrec < NextTokPrec ||
(ThisPrec == NextTokPrec && isRightAssoc)) {
+ if (!LHS.isInvalid() && isa<InitListExpr>(LHS.get())) {
+ Diag(OpToken, diag::err_init_list_bin_op)
+ << /*LHS*/0 << PP.getSpelling(OpToken) << LHS.get()->getSourceRange();
+ LHS = ExprError();
+ }
// If this is left-associative, only parse things on the RHS that bind
// more tightly than the current operator. If it is left-associative, it
// is okay, to bind exactly as tightly. For example, compile A=B=C=D as
}
assert(NextTokPrec <= ThisPrec && "Recursion didn't work!");
+ if (!RHS.isInvalid() && isa<InitListExpr>(RHS.get())) {
+ if (ThisPrec == prec::Assignment) {
+ Diag(OpToken, diag::warn_cxx98_compat_generalized_initializer_lists)
+ << RHS.get()->getSourceRange();
+ } else {
+ Diag(OpToken, diag::err_init_list_bin_op)
+ << /*RHS*/1 << PP.getSpelling(OpToken) << RHS.get()->getSourceRange();
+ LHS = ExprError();
+ }
+ }
+
if (!LHS.isInvalid()) {
// Combine the LHS and RHS into the LHS (e.g. build AST).
if (TernaryMiddle.isInvalid()) {
int a, b;
a = b = { 1 };
- a = { 1 } = b;
+ a = { 1 } = b; // expected-error {{initializer list cannot be used on the left hand side of operator '='}}
+ a = a + { 4 }; // expected-error {{initializer list cannot be used on the right hand side of operator '+'}}
+ a = { 3 } * { 4 }; // expected-error {{initializer list cannot be used on the left hand side of operator '*'}} \
+ expected-error {{initializer list cannot be used on the right hand side of operator '*'}}
}
struct S {
static_assert((T() = {4, 9}) == 4, "");
static_assert((T() += {4, 9}) == 9, "");
-int k1 = T() = { 1, 2 } = { 3, 4 }; // expected-error {{expected ';'}}
-int k2 = T() = { 1, 2 } + 1; // expected-error {{expected ';'}}
+int k1 = T() = { 1, 2 } = { 3, 4 }; // expected-error {{initializer list cannot be used on the left hand side of operator '='}}
+int k2 = T() = { 1, 2 } + 1; // expected-error {{initializer list cannot be used on the left hand side of operator '+'}}