Summary:
It looks like since INLINEASM_BR was created off of INLINEASM, a few
checks for INLINEASM needed to be updated to check for either case.
pr/41999
Reviewers: t.p.northover, peter.smith
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Subscribers: craig.topper, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits, peter.smith, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62402
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@361661
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
const MachineFunction *MF = MBB.getParent();
const MCAsmInfo *MAI = MF->getTarget().getMCAsmInfo();
- if (MI.getOpcode() == AArch64::INLINEASM)
- return getInlineAsmLength(MI.getOperand(0).getSymbolName(), *MAI);
+ {
+ auto Op = MI.getOpcode();
+ if (Op == AArch64::INLINEASM || Op == AArch64::INLINEASM_BR)
+ return getInlineAsmLength(MI.getOperand(0).getSymbolName(), *MAI);
+ }
// FIXME: We currently only handle pseudoinstructions that don't get expanded
// before the assembly printer.