}
void LivePhysRegs::addLiveOutsNoPristines(const MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
- if (!MBB.succ_empty()) {
- // To get the live-outs we simply merge the live-ins of all successors.
- for (const MachineBasicBlock *Succ : MBB.successors())
- addBlockLiveIns(*Succ);
- } else if (MBB.isReturnBlock()) {
- // For the return block: Add all callee saved registers that are saved and
- // restored (somewhere); This does not include callee saved registers that
- // are unused and hence not saved and restored; they are called pristine.
+ // To get the live-outs we simply merge the live-ins of all successors.
+ for (const MachineBasicBlock *Succ : MBB.successors())
+ addBlockLiveIns(*Succ);
+ if (MBB.isReturnBlock()) {
+ // Return blocks are a special case because we currently don't mark up
+ // return instructions completely: specifically, there is no explicit
+ // use for callee-saved registers. So we add all callee saved registers
+ // that are saved and restored (somewhere). This does not include
+ // callee saved registers that are unused and hence not saved and
+ // restored; they are called pristine.
+ // FIXME: PEI should add explicit markings to return instructions
+ // instead of implicitly handling them here.
const MachineFunction &MF = *MBB.getParent();
const MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
if (MFI.isCalleeSavedInfoValid()) {
void LivePhysRegs::addLiveOuts(const MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
const MachineFunction &MF = *MBB.getParent();
- if (!MBB.succ_empty()) {
- addPristines(MF);
- addLiveOutsNoPristines(MBB);
- } else if (MBB.isReturnBlock()) {
- // For the return block: Add all callee saved registers.
- const MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
- if (MFI.isCalleeSavedInfoValid())
- addCalleeSavedRegs(*this, MF);
- }
+ addPristines(MF);
+ addLiveOutsNoPristines(MBB);
}
void LivePhysRegs::addLiveIns(const MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: llc < %s | FileCheck %s
+target triple = "thumbv6---gnueabi"
+
+; Use STM to save the three registers
+; CHECK-LABEL: use_stm:
+; CHECK: .save {r7, lr}
+; CHECK: .setfp r7, sp
+; CHECK: stm r3!, {r0, r1, r2}
+; CHECK: bl throws_1
+define void @use_stm(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c, i32* %d) local_unnamed_addr noreturn "no-frame-pointer-elim"="true" {
+entry:
+ %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %d, i32 2
+ store i32 %a, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+ %arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %d, i32 3
+ store i32 %b, i32* %arrayidx1, align 4
+ %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %d, i32 4
+ store i32 %c, i32* %arrayidx2, align 4
+ tail call void @throws_1(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c) noreturn
+ unreachable
+}
+
+; Don't use STM: there is no available register to store
+; the address. We could transform this with some extra math, but
+; that currently isn't implemented.
+; CHECK-LABEL: no_stm:
+; CHECK: .save {r7, lr}
+; CHECK: .setfp r7, sp
+; CHECK: str r0,
+; CHECK: str r1,
+; CHECK: str r2,
+; CHECK: bl throws_2
+define void @no_stm(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c, i32* %d) local_unnamed_addr noreturn "no-frame-pointer-elim"="true" {
+entry:
+ %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %d, i32 2
+ store i32 %a, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+ %arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %d, i32 3
+ store i32 %b, i32* %arrayidx1, align 4
+ %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %d, i32 4
+ store i32 %c, i32* %arrayidx2, align 4
+ tail call void @throws_2(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c, i32* %d) noreturn
+ unreachable
+}
+
+
+declare void @throws_1(i32, i32, i32) noreturn
+declare void @throws_2(i32, i32, i32, i32*) noreturn