Test associated to this issue should nicely fail. Fixes issue 194
opj_read_bytes(p_header_data,&tmp,1); /* YRsiz_i */
++p_header_data;
l_img_comp->dy = (OPJ_INT32)tmp; /* should be between 1 and 255 */
+ if( l_img_comp->dx < 1 || l_img_comp->dx > 255 ||
+ l_img_comp->dy < 1 || l_img_comp->dy > 255 ) {
+ opj_event_msg(p_manager, EVT_ERROR,
+ "Invalid values for comp = %d : dx=%u dy=%u\n (should be between 1 and 255 according the JPEG2000 norm)",
+ i, l_img_comp->dx, l_img_comp->dy);
+ return OPJ_FALSE;
+ }
#ifdef USE_JPWL
if (l_cp->correct) {
! opj_decompress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/gdal_fuzzer_assert_in_opj_j2k_read_SQcd_SQcc.patch.jp2 -o @TEMP_PATH@/gdal_fuzzer_assert_in_opj_j2k_read_SQcd_SQcc.patch.pgx
# issue 193 raised by the gdal fuzzer test (should nicely failed)
!opj_decompress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/gdal_fuzzer_check_number_of_tiles.jp2 -o @TEMP_PATH@/gdal_fuzzer_check_number_of_tiles.pgx
-# issue 194 raised by the gdal fuzzer test (should properly failed)
-opj_decompress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/gdal_fuzzer_check_comp_dx_dy.jp2 -o @TEMP_PATH@/gdal_fuzzer_check_comp_dx_dy.pgx
+# issue 194 raised by the gdal fuzzer test (should nicely failed)
+! opj_decompress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/gdal_fuzzer_check_comp_dx_dy.jp2 -o @TEMP_PATH@/gdal_fuzzer_check_comp_dx_dy.pgx
# decode with specific area
# prec=12; nb_c=1