does anyone need/use ndbm?

if so should we make it a apr_util_dbm DB type?
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@92617 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 4b0a9a987e8ed25e941f848a28baee88cf4a8566..b0e9ea742c4ee89b40566d5c946670473dbcbf4d 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 2.0 STATUS:                                             -*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/27 06:03:13 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/27 06:08:12 $]
 
 Release:
 
@@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:
                     a userlist via dbm, which has to remain readable between
                     builds/machines, etc.  The use-multiple database schema
                     for apr-util would let us do this with just apr, though."
+               Ian says:  "multi-dbm is in, but it still has ndbm support hardcoded
+                           is this still required? isn't ndbm supported via gdbm?"
+
 
     * Integrate mod_dav.
         Some additional items remaining: