}
}
+static int ssl_check_post_client_verify(request_rec *r, SSLSrvConfigRec *sc,
+ SSLDirConfigRec *dc, SSLConnRec *sslconn, SSL *ssl)
+{
+ /*
+ * Finally check for acceptable renegotiation results
+ */
+ if ((dc->nVerifyClient != SSL_CVERIFY_NONE) ||
+ (sc->server->auth.verify_mode != SSL_CVERIFY_NONE)) {
+ BOOL do_verify = ((dc->nVerifyClient == SSL_CVERIFY_REQUIRE) ||
+ (sc->server->auth.verify_mode == SSL_CVERIFY_REQUIRE));
+
+ if (do_verify && (SSL_get_verify_result(ssl) != X509_V_OK)) {
+ ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, APLOGNO(02262)
+ "Re-negotiation handshake failed: "
+ "Client verification failed");
+
+ return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
+ }
+
+ if (do_verify) {
+ X509 *peercert;
+
+ if ((peercert = SSL_get_peer_certificate(ssl)) == NULL) {
+ ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, APLOGNO(02263)
+ "Re-negotiation handshake failed: "
+ "Client certificate missing");
+
+ return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
+ }
+
+ X509_free(peercert);
+ }
+ }
+ return OK;
+}
+
/*
- * Access Handler
+ * Access Handler, classic flavour, for SSL/TLS up to v1.2
+ * where everything can be renegotiated and no one is happy.
*/
-int ssl_hook_Access(request_rec *r)
+static int ssl_hook_Access_classic(request_rec *r, SSLSrvConfigRec *sc, SSLDirConfigRec *dc,
+ SSLConnRec *sslconn, SSL *ssl)
{
- SSLDirConfigRec *dc = myDirConfig(r);
- SSLSrvConfigRec *sc = mySrvConfig(r->server);
- SSLConnRec *sslconn = myConnConfig(r->connection);
- SSL *ssl = sslconn ? sslconn->ssl : NULL;
server_rec *handshakeserver = sslconn ? sslconn->server : NULL;
SSLSrvConfigRec *hssc = handshakeserver? mySrvConfig(handshakeserver) : NULL;
SSL_CTX *ctx = NULL;
apr_array_header_t *requires;
ssl_require_t *ssl_requires;
- int ok, i;
+ int ok, i, rc;
BOOL renegotiate = FALSE, renegotiate_quick = FALSE;
X509 *cert;
X509 *peercert;
X509_STORE_CTX *cert_store_ctx;
STACK_OF(SSL_CIPHER) *cipher_list_old = NULL, *cipher_list = NULL;
const SSL_CIPHER *cipher = NULL;
- int depth, verify_old, verify, n, is_slave = 0;
+ int depth, verify_old, verify, n;
const char *ncipher_suite;
- /* On a slave connection, we do not expect to have an SSLConnRec, but
- * our master connection might have one. */
- if (!(sslconn && ssl) && r->connection->master) {
- sslconn = myConnConfig(r->connection->master);
- ssl = sslconn ? sslconn->ssl : NULL;
- handshakeserver = sslconn ? sslconn->server : NULL;
- hssc = handshakeserver? mySrvConfig(handshakeserver) : NULL;
- is_slave = 1;
- }
-
- if (ssl) {
- /*
- * We should have handshaken here (on handshakeserver),
- * otherwise we are being redirected (ErrorDocument) from
- * a renegotiation failure below. The access is still
- * forbidden in the latter case, let ap_die() handle
- * this recursive (same) error.
- */
- if (!SSL_is_init_finished(ssl)) {
- return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
- }
- ctx = SSL_get_SSL_CTX(ssl);
- }
-
- /*
- * Support for SSLRequireSSL directive
- */
- if (dc->bSSLRequired && !ssl) {
- if ((sc->enabled == SSL_ENABLED_OPTIONAL) && !is_slave) {
- /* This vhost was configured for optional SSL, just tell the
- * client that we need to upgrade.
- */
- apr_table_setn(r->err_headers_out, "Upgrade", "TLS/1.0, HTTP/1.1");
- apr_table_setn(r->err_headers_out, "Connection", "Upgrade");
-
- return HTTP_UPGRADE_REQUIRED;
- }
-
- ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, APLOGNO(02219)
- "access to %s failed, reason: %s",
- r->filename, "SSL connection required");
-
- /* remember forbidden access for strict require option */
- apr_table_setn(r->notes, "ssl-access-forbidden", "1");
-
- return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
- }
-
- /*
- * Check to see whether SSL is in use; if it's not, then no
- * further access control checks are relevant. (the test for
- * sc->enabled is probably strictly unnecessary)
- */
- if (sc->enabled == SSL_ENABLED_FALSE || !ssl) {
- return DECLINED;
- }
-
#ifdef HAVE_SRP
/*
* Support for per-directory reconfigured SSL connection parameters
}
/* configure new state */
- if (is_slave) {
+ if (r->connection->master) {
/* TODO: this categorically fails changed cipher suite settings
* on slave connections. We could do better by
* - create a new SSL* from our SSL_CTX and set cipher suite there,
}
if (renegotiate) {
- if (is_slave) {
+ if (r->connection->master) {
/* The request causes renegotiation on a slave connection.
* This is not allowed since we might have concurrent requests
* on this connection.
(verify & SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT)))
{
renegotiate = TRUE;
- if (is_slave) {
+ if (r->connection->master) {
/* The request causes renegotiation on a slave connection.
* This is not allowed since we might have concurrent requests
* on this connection.
/*
* Finally check for acceptable renegotiation results
*/
- if ((dc->nVerifyClient != SSL_CVERIFY_NONE) ||
- (sc->server->auth.verify_mode != SSL_CVERIFY_NONE)) {
- BOOL do_verify = ((dc->nVerifyClient == SSL_CVERIFY_REQUIRE) ||
- (sc->server->auth.verify_mode == SSL_CVERIFY_REQUIRE));
-
- if (do_verify && (SSL_get_verify_result(ssl) != X509_V_OK)) {
- ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, APLOGNO(02262)
- "Re-negotiation handshake failed: "
- "Client verification failed");
-
- return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
- }
-
- if (do_verify) {
- if ((peercert = SSL_get_peer_certificate(ssl)) == NULL) {
- ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, APLOGNO(02263)
- "Re-negotiation handshake failed: "
- "Client certificate missing");
-
- return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
- }
-
- X509_free(peercert);
- }
+ if (OK != (rc = ssl_check_post_client_verify(r, sc, dc, sslconn, ssl))) {
+ return rc;
}
/*
return DECLINED;
}
+/*
+ * Access Handler, modern flavour, for SSL/TLS v1.3 and onward.
+ * Only client certificates can be requested, everything else stays.
+ */
+static int ssl_hook_Access_modern(request_rec *r, SSLSrvConfigRec *sc, SSLDirConfigRec *dc,
+ SSLConnRec *sslconn, SSL *ssl)
+{
+#ifdef SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_3
+ if ((dc->nVerifyClient != SSL_CVERIFY_UNSET) ||
+ (sc->server->auth.verify_mode != SSL_CVERIFY_UNSET)) {
+ int vmode_inplace, vmode_needed;
+ int change_vmode = FALSE;
+ int old_state, n, rc;
+
+ vmode_inplace = SSL_get_verify_mode(ssl);
+ vmode_needed = SSL_VERIFY_NONE;
+
+ if ((dc->nVerifyClient == SSL_CVERIFY_REQUIRE) ||
+ (sc->server->auth.verify_mode == SSL_CVERIFY_REQUIRE)) {
+ vmode_needed |= SSL_VERIFY_PEER_STRICT;
+ }
+
+ if ((dc->nVerifyClient == SSL_CVERIFY_OPTIONAL) ||
+ (dc->nVerifyClient == SSL_CVERIFY_OPTIONAL_NO_CA) ||
+ (sc->server->auth.verify_mode == SSL_CVERIFY_OPTIONAL) ||
+ (sc->server->auth.verify_mode == SSL_CVERIFY_OPTIONAL_NO_CA))
+ {
+ vmode_needed |= SSL_VERIFY_PEER;
+ }
+
+ if (vmode_needed == SSL_VERIFY_NONE) {
+ return DECLINED;
+ }
+
+ vmode_needed |= SSL_VERIFY_CLIENT_ONCE;
+ if (vmode_inplace != vmode_needed) {
+ /* Need to change, if new setting is more restrictive than existing one */
+
+ if ((vmode_inplace == SSL_VERIFY_NONE)
+ || (!(vmode_inplace & SSL_VERIFY_PEER)
+ && (vmode_needed & SSL_VERIFY_PEER))
+ || (!(vmode_inplace & SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT)
+ && (vmode_inplace & SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT))) {
+ /* need to change the effective verify mode */
+ change_vmode = TRUE;
+ }
+ else {
+ /* FIXME: does this work with TLSv1.3? Is this more than re-inspecting
+ * the certificate we should already have? */
+ /*
+ * override of SSLVerifyDepth
+ *
+ * The depth checks are handled by us manually inside the
+ * verify callback function and not by OpenSSL internally
+ * (and our function is aware of both the per-server and
+ * per-directory contexts). So we cannot ask OpenSSL about
+ * the currently verify depth. Instead we remember it in our
+ * SSLConnRec attached to the SSL* of OpenSSL. We've to force
+ * the renegotiation if the reconfigured/new verify depth is
+ * less than the currently active/remembered verify depth
+ * (because this means more restriction on the certificate
+ * chain).
+ */
+ n = (sslconn->verify_depth != UNSET)?
+ sslconn->verify_depth : sc->server->auth.verify_depth;
+ /* determine the new depth */
+ sslconn->verify_depth = (dc->nVerifyDepth != UNSET)
+ ? dc->nVerifyDepth
+ : sc->server->auth.verify_depth;
+ if (sslconn->verify_depth < n) {
+ change_vmode = TRUE;
+ ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, r, APLOGNO()
+ "Reduced client verification depth will "
+ "force renegotiation");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (change_vmode) {
+ char peekbuf[1];
+
+ if (r->connection->master) {
+ /* FIXME: modifying the SSL on a slave connection is no good.
+ * We would need to push this back to the master connection
+ * somehow.
+ */
+ apr_table_setn(r->notes, "ssl-renegotiate-forbidden", "verify-client");
+ return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
+ }
+
+ ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, APLOGNO() "verify client post handshake");
+
+ SSL_set_verify(ssl, vmode_needed, ssl_callback_SSLVerify);
+ SSL_verify_client_post_handshake(ssl);
+
+ old_state = sslconn->reneg_state;
+ sslconn->reneg_state = RENEG_ALLOW;
+ modssl_set_app_data2(ssl, r);
+
+ SSL_do_handshake(ssl);
+ /* Need to trigger renegotiation handshake by reading.
+ * Peeking 0 bytes actually works.
+ * See: http://marc.info/?t=145493359200002&r=1&w=2
+ */
+ SSL_peek(ssl, peekbuf, 0);
+
+ sslconn->reneg_state = old_state;
+ modssl_set_app_data2(ssl, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Finally check for acceptable renegotiation results
+ */
+ if (OK != (rc = ssl_check_post_client_verify(r, sc, dc, sslconn, ssl))) {
+ return rc;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return DECLINED;
+#else
+ /* We should never have been called. Play it safe. */
+ return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
+#endif
+}
+
+int ssl_hook_Access(request_rec *r)
+{
+ SSLDirConfigRec *dc = myDirConfig(r);
+ SSLSrvConfigRec *sc = mySrvConfig(r->server);
+ SSLConnRec *sslconn = myConnConfig(r->connection);
+ SSL *ssl = sslconn ? sslconn->ssl : NULL;
+ server_rec *handshakeserver = sslconn ? sslconn->server : NULL;
+ SSLSrvConfigRec *hssc = handshakeserver? mySrvConfig(handshakeserver) : NULL;
+ SSL_CTX *ctx = NULL;
+
+ /* On a slave connection, we do not expect to have an SSLConnRec, but
+ * our master connection might have one. */
+ if (!(sslconn && ssl) && r->connection->master) {
+ sslconn = myConnConfig(r->connection->master);
+ ssl = sslconn ? sslconn->ssl : NULL;
+ handshakeserver = sslconn ? sslconn->server : NULL;
+ hssc = handshakeserver? mySrvConfig(handshakeserver) : NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (ssl) {
+ /*
+ * We should have handshaken here (on handshakeserver),
+ * otherwise we are being redirected (ErrorDocument) from
+ * a renegotiation failure below. The access is still
+ * forbidden in the latter case, let ap_die() handle
+ * this recursive (same) error.
+ */
+ if (!SSL_is_init_finished(ssl)) {
+ return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
+ }
+ ctx = SSL_get_SSL_CTX(ssl);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Support for SSLRequireSSL directive
+ */
+ if (dc->bSSLRequired && !ssl) {
+ if ((sc->enabled == SSL_ENABLED_OPTIONAL) && !r->connection->master) {
+ /* This vhost was configured for optional SSL, just tell the
+ * client that we need to upgrade.
+ */
+ apr_table_setn(r->err_headers_out, "Upgrade", "TLS/1.0, HTTP/1.1");
+ apr_table_setn(r->err_headers_out, "Connection", "Upgrade");
+
+ return HTTP_UPGRADE_REQUIRED;
+ }
+
+ ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, APLOGNO(02219)
+ "access to %s failed, reason: %s",
+ r->filename, "SSL connection required");
+
+ /* remember forbidden access for strict require option */
+ apr_table_setn(r->notes, "ssl-access-forbidden", "1");
+
+ return HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check to see whether SSL is in use; if it's not, then no
+ * further access control checks are relevant. (the test for
+ * sc->enabled is probably strictly unnecessary)
+ */
+ if (sc->enabled == SSL_ENABLED_FALSE || !ssl) {
+ return DECLINED;
+ }
+
+#ifdef SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_3
+ /* TLSv1.3+ is less complicated here. Branch off into a new codeline
+ * and avoid messing with the past. */
+ if (SSL_version(ssl) >= TLS1_3_VERSION) {
+ return ssl_hook_Access_modern(r, sc, dc, sslconn, ssl);
+ }
+#endif
+ return ssl_hook_Access_classic(r, sc, dc, sslconn, ssl);
+}
+
/*
* Authentication Handler:
* Fake a Basic authentication from the X509 client certificate.