address space. I could see that this functionality would be useful,
but not in its current form (where the address space is ignored):
rather, we'd want to encode the address space into the parameter list
passed to operator new/operator delete somehow, which would require a
bunch more semantic analysis.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@129593
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
"implicit conversion from array size expression of type %0 to "
"%select{integral|enumeration}1 type %2 is a C++0x extension">,
InGroup<CXX0x>;
-
+def err_address_space_qualified_new : Error<
+ "'new' cannot allocate objects of type %0 in address space '%1'">;
+def err_address_space_qualified_delete : Error<
+ "'delete' cannot delete objects of type %0 in address space '%1'">;
+
def err_default_init_const : Error<
"default initialization of an object of const type %0"
"%select{| requires a user-provided default constructor}1">;
else if (AllocType->isVariablyModifiedType())
return Diag(Loc, diag::err_variably_modified_new_type)
<< AllocType;
-
+ else if (unsigned AddressSpace = AllocType.getAddressSpace())
+ return Diag(Loc, diag::err_address_space_qualified_new)
+ << AllocType.getUnqualifiedType() << AddressSpace;
+
return false;
}
PDiag(diag::warn_delete_incomplete)
<< Ex.get()->getSourceRange()))
return ExprError();
-
+ else if (unsigned AddressSpace = Pointee.getAddressSpace())
+ return Diag(Ex.get()->getLocStart(),
+ diag::err_address_space_qualified_delete)
+ << Pointee.getUnqualifiedType() << AddressSpace;
// C++ [expr.delete]p2:
// [Note: a pointer to a const type can be the operand of a
// delete-expression; it is not necessary to cast away the constness
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+void* operator new (__SIZE_TYPE__ size, void* ptr);
+void* operator new[](__SIZE_TYPE__ size, void* ptr);
+
+typedef int __attribute__((address_space(1))) int_1;
+
+void test_new(void *p) {
+ (void)new int_1; // expected-error{{'new' cannot allocate objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+ (void)new __attribute__((address_space(1))) int; // expected-error{{'new' cannot allocate objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+ (void)new int_1 [5]; // expected-error{{'new' cannot allocate objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+ (void)new __attribute__((address_space(1))) int [5]; // expected-error{{'new' cannot allocate objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+
+ // Placement new
+ (void)new (p) int_1; // expected-error{{'new' cannot allocate objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+ (void)new (p) __attribute__((address_space(1))) int; // expected-error{{'new' cannot allocate objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+ (void)new (p) int_1 [5]; // expected-error{{'new' cannot allocate objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+ (void)new (p) __attribute__((address_space(1))) int [5]; // expected-error{{'new' cannot allocate objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+}
+
+void test_delete(int_1 *ip1) {
+ delete ip1; // expected-error{{'delete' cannot delete objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+ delete [] ip1; // expected-error{{'delete' cannot delete objects of type 'int' in address space '1'}}
+}