situation will be no worse than if the standby queries were running
directly on the primary server, and you are still getting the benefit of
off-loading execution onto the standby.
- <varname>max_standby_archive_delay</> must be kept large in this case,
- because delayed WAL files might already contain entries that conflict with
- the desired standby queries.
+ If standby servers connect and disconnect frequently, you
+ might want to make adjustments to handle the period when
+ <varname>hot_standby_feedback</> feedback is not being provided.
+ For example, consider increasing <varname>max_standby_archive_delay</>
+ so that queries are not rapidly cancelled by conflicts in WAL archive
+ files during disconnected periods. You should also consider increasing
+ <varname>max_standby_streaming_delay</> to avoid rapid cancellations
+ by newly-arrived streaming WAL entries after reconnection.
</para>
<para>